Memory Alpha
Memory Alpha
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Record labels category.
For general discussion, please visit Memory Alpha's Discussions, or join the chat on Discord.


Record companies[]

From Memory Alpha:Category suggestions

The following articles, all in Category:Companies, could have a subcategory of their own, perhaps titled Category:Record companies or Category:Record labels:

Random House Audio and Simon & Schuster might fit in the category too, depending on how it's named and defined. –Josiah Rowe 04:22, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

I support the idea, but I'm not crazy about either name. - Archduk3 04:37, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
How about "Music distributors" or "Music publishers"?--31dot 10:01, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

I think "Music publishers" is better than "music distributors", but it's worth noting that Peter Pan Records was primarily about stories, not music. For what (little) it's worth, Wikipedia uses Category:Record labels, though I agree that it sounds a bit archaic these days. Perhaps something with "audio" in the title might work? –Josiah Rowe 20:17, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

Record labels seems to be the best so far. I'm still not thrilled about it though, but I doubt there's a good name for this anyway. - Archduk3 19:26, October 19, 2010 (UTC)