FANDOM


m (Nominations without objections: nominated Guinan)
m (rm 2, 1 pass 1 fail)
 
(2,761 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{FeatNom}}
+
{{FANoms}}
 
 
==Nominations without objections==
 
==Nominations without objections==
<!--When moving nominations to this section, add to top.-->
 
* [[Guinan]]. Self nomination. Heavily expanded over the past few days. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 11:52, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 
 
*[[Timescape]] '''(self nomination)''' - I know that the summary has barely been here for a day but I feel that it is as detailed and as well written as the other featured TNG episode write-ups with an extensive use of references and appropriate use of pictures.--[[User:Scimitar|Scimitar]] 22:54, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
 
**'''Support''' but the table needs to be wikified. [[User:AmdrBoltz|AmdrBoltz]] 02:14, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 
**'''Support''', very well done![[User:Jaz|Jaz]] 02:17, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 
   
 
==Nominations with objections==
 
==Nominations with objections==
<!--When moving nominations to this section, add to top.-->
 
* [[Klaa]]. Minor charcter, self nomination. Written in five edits or less (!!), several months ago; upon recent review, the quality still seems to stand. --[[User:Gvsualan|Gvsualan]] 20:16, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
 
** '''Oppose''' -- due to several spelling and grammatical errors. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] | [[User talk:Defiant|''Talk'']] 08:37, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 
*** Why did I not see this coming? This is just petty. There are '''no''' spelling errors, much less "several" and the grammar is better than a lot of other stuff that has successfully passed through here. In fact, the more I look at this, it ''almost'' seems to be something of a ''personal attack'', which I do believe is uncalled for in M/A. --[[User:Gvsualan|Gvsualan]] 08:56, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 
** I '''support''' this article, but if the two of you could stop throwing mud it would make me happy. [[User:Tyrant|Tyrant]] 12:54, 29 May 2005 (UTC)Tyrant
 
** '''Support''', but I'm not sure why the second or third images of Klaa are needed (with respect to the [[Memory Alpha:Image use policy|image use policy]])... the third one in particular is not very clear and they really don't show anything new that can't be seen in the first image. -- [[User:SmokeDetector47|SmokeDetector47]] // [[User_talk:SmokeDetector47|''talk'']] 04:43, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
 
*** I've removed the last picture -- despite the poor quality, it ''was'' the best image of [[Todd Bryant]]'s character from ST6, which is mentioned in the article. Additionally, I still think the 2nd picture of Klaa at the scope balances the article out -- as in: the article ''is'' long enough to support a second picture of Klaa placed in it to balance the article out from being too "top heavy". The fact that Klaa is sitting at the weapons scope goes along quite well with the theme that he was "thirsting for a target that would fight back." But I do have an alternative in mind as well to put in it's place. --[[User:Gvsualan|Gvsualan]] 06:47, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
 
:::*Re: Tyrant -- Frankly, I agree. But then again, I've made no personal attacks here. All I've done is simply state that the "oppose" is ''purely'' based on a ''personal'' nature and that there are '''no''' spelling errors, nor any ''glaring'' grammarical errors to warrant an obviously ''biased'' vote. In reality, that alone should void the vote. --[[User:Gvsualan|Gvsualan]] 06:47, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
 
::::*Sorry, but neither have I made any personal attacks. I wouldn't oppose a nomination unless I could back it up. If you want me to list grammatical and spelling errors found in this article, I'd be quite happy to do that. Just tell me where, and I'll get started! --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] | [[User talk:Defiant|''Talk'']] 10:37, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
 
:::::*You're welcome to do so, but I think it would be much more useful if you went in and attempted to fix the errors on your own. :) -- [[User:SmokeDetector47|SmokeDetector47]] // [[User_talk:SmokeDetector47|''talk'']] 19:07, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
 
::::::*I've corrected most of the errors, but I still have a problem with the article - in quite a few places, Klaa's actions are stated, not his ship's. For example, "he made his intentions to attack clear, by approaching the ''Enterprise'' fully [[cloaking device|cloaked]]." His ship was cloaked, not Klaa himself! I don't know how to change this, however. The errors that I knew how to correct, I have. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] | [[User talk:Defiant|''Talk'']] 20:22, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
 
*'''Oppose'''. I would like to see a table with biographical information before this becomes a featured article[[User:Jaz|Jaz]]
 
*'''Support''' - Added the table and divisions (the divisions I'm not perfectly happy with, could someone maybe rename them?) but for some reason, in my opinion Articles always look better with divisors. Was thinking of the last one as "Demotion". - [[User:AJHalliwell|AJHalliwell]] 01:00, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 
**'''Support''' [[User:AmdrBoltz|AmdrBoltz]] 01:18, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 

Latest revision as of 14:27, April 9, 2020

Memory Alpha  AboutPolicies and guidelinesFA policiesFA criteria → Featured article nominations

This page is for the nomination and discussion of articles that may be potentially included in Memory Alpha's list of featured articles. A featured article is an especially well-written, informative, and comprehensive article that covers all available information on a subject. If you feel one of our articles meets this criteria, you may suggest it here in accordance with the nomination policy. For a list of articles previously nominated, see the archive.

To bring up a current featured article for review, please see the review procedure.

To nominate an article, start a new discussion under "Nominations without objections" with a heading named for the article you want to suggest. Provide an appropriate picture and a two- to three-paragraph summary of the article. This is usually the article's lead-in if possible, and should not contain any links, except to the article itself. This is what will be displayed on the main page and in the portals if the nomination is successful. Followed that by a brief reason why you feel the article should be featured.

Sample format:

=== <article> ===
[[File:<image>|thumb|<caption>]]
'''[[<article>]]''' <summary>
----
<reasoning> - <signature>

Once this is done, a notice that the article has been nominated as a featured article candidate should be added to the article in question by inserting {{fan}} at the top of the page, above any other templates except the article type template.

When you are commenting on a nomination, please take the time to read the entire article before you decide whether to Support or Oppose the nomination. Nominations with objections should be moved to the appropriate section until they are resolved.

When supporting or opposing an article, please use a bullet point (by adding a * before your comment) without any indent so these will be easy to find later. General comments should be indented as usual, and, as always, please sign your nominations and comments with "~~~~".


Nominations without objectionsEdit

Nominations with objectionsEdit

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.