m
m (rm 2, 1 pass 1 fail)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{msg:FeatNom}}
+
{{FANoms}}
 
 
==Nominations without objections==
 
==Nominations without objections==
<!--Add new nominations on top, one section per nomination.-->
 
 
* [[All Good Things...]] is, I think, one of the best episode summaries I've seen on MA to date. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] wrote most of it. I made some modifications, and I think it is now ready (maybe needs a link/spelling/gramar check, but that's all) -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] 21:24, 29 Jul 2004 (CEST)
 
 
*[[Dukat]]- Well written, documented, and extensive. One of the best character profiles I've seen. I added a whole lot and I think it looks great. [[User:Ryan123450|Ryan123450]] 12:04, Aug 11, 2004 (CEST)
 
**Seconded. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 19:11, 11 Aug 2004 (CEST)
 
   
 
==Nominations with objections==
 
==Nominations with objections==
<!--Add new nominations on top, one section per nomination.-->
 
 
* [[Borg]]. It's not complete yet, but it already has so much so well organised information I feel it would already make a good featured article. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] 20:46, 28 Jul 2004 (CEST)
 
:This would make a good featured article, but I think we still need a lot of information there on the Borg in the Delta Quadrant, prior to ''Endgame''. Opposed, for now... [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 10:45, 5 Aug 2004 (CEST)
 
::You're right. Let's keep this listing for another day, than archive it.
 
 
* [[Michael Eddington]] - Well organised, well written and contributed to by a few different people. [[User:A peckover|Alex Peckover]] 08:47, Aug 5, 2004 (CEST)
 
**I helped write a large chunk of this one, and I agree. [[User:Ryan123450|Ryan123450]] 12:04, Aug 11, 2004 (CEST)
 
**Oppose (for now). I find the article clear and conscise. Maybe a bit to conscise. I feel there should be more info added about what we learned in "[[For the Uniform]]". -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 19:11, 11 Aug 2004 (CEST)
 

Latest revision as of 14:27, 9 April 2020

Memory Alpha  AboutPolicies and guidelinesFA policiesFA criteria → Featured article nominations

This page is for the nomination and discussion of articles that may be potentially included in Memory Alpha's list of featured articles. A featured article is an especially well-written, informative, and comprehensive article that covers all available information on a subject. If you feel one of our articles meets this criteria, you may suggest it here in accordance with the nomination policy. For a list of articles previously nominated, see the archive.

To bring up a current featured article for review, please see the review procedure.

To nominate an article, start a new discussion under "Nominations without objections" with a heading named for the article you want to suggest. Provide an appropriate picture and a two- to three-paragraph summary of the article. This is usually the article's lead-in if possible, and should not contain any links, except to the article itself. This is what will be displayed on the main page and in the portals if the nomination is successful. Followed that by a brief reason why you feel the article should be featured.

Sample format:

=== <article> ===
[[File:<image>|thumb|<caption>]]
'''[[<article>]]''' <summary>
----
<reasoning> - <signature>

Once this is done, a notice that the article has been nominated as a featured article candidate should be added to the article in question by inserting {{fan}} at the top of the page, above any other templates except the article type template.

When you are commenting on a nomination, please take the time to read the entire article before you decide whether to Support or Oppose the nomination. Nominations with objections should be moved to the appropriate section until they are resolved.

When supporting or opposing an article, please use a bullet point (by adding a * before your comment) without any indent so these will be easy to find later. General comments should be indented as usual, and, as always, please sign your nominations and comments with "~~~~".


Nominations without objections

Nominations with objections

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.