m (rm 2, 1 pass 1 fail)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Nominations without objections==
==Nominations without objections==
<!--Add new nominations on top, one section per nomination.-->
*[[Ezri Dax]] -- Self-nomination. Having ''finally'' finished this article, I present it to be nominated as a feature article. Packed to the gills, this one is! I've detailed Ezri's involvement in every episode of [[DS9 Season 7]], which was quite substantial... -- [[User:DarkHorizon|Michael Warren]] | [[User talk:DarkHorizon|''Talk'']] 00:25, Sep 3, 2004 (CEST)
*[[Klingon]]: With the help of various people a detailed article has been created here. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 01:42, Aug 26, 2004 (CEST)
**Enough information, not too long: Second. Although I would gather the various traditions and rituals spread throughout the article and put them together under a single header. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 13:08, 26 Aug 2004 (CEST)
*[[Elim Garak]]: After [[User:Ryan123450]] has added lots of good info, i would call that a featured article. my compliments Ryan. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 17:01, Aug 25, 2004 (CEST)
**I don't know. There is certainly enough info, but I'm mising a structure, a red line. I'll hold off my vote for now. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 13:08, 26 Aug 2004 (CEST)
**SECONDED. Thanks BlueMars! I think it's pretty good too.[[User:Ryan123450|Ryan123450]] 17:47, 2 Sep 2004 (CEST)
*[[Beverly Crusher]] My compliments to [[User:SmokeDetector47|SmokeDetector47]], who single handedly changed this article from a stub to an IMO worthy featured article. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 11:22, 21 Aug 2004 (CEST)
**Supported. Certainly. Good work! [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 12:07, 21 Aug 2004 (CEST)
**Seconded. Very good work! --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 13:06, Aug 21, 2004 (CEST)
**Gets my vote. Very detailed and very thorough. [[User:A peckover|Alex Peckover]] 08:55, Aug 26, 2004 (CEST)
**Support. -- [[User:DarkHorizon|Michael Warren]] | [[User talk:DarkHorizon|''Talk'']] 17:52, Sep 2, 2004 (CEST)
*[[Sickbay]], another article by the knowledgable SmokeDetector47, created overnight. Along with [{Crusher]] and [{The Doctor]], perhaps we should have a new category in the Featured Articles: Medical. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 14:18, 22 Aug 2004 (CEST)
**Support. Certainly great work!. However, I think i'm gonna implement images of Defiant-class, Sovereign-class and Intrepid-class sickbays.--[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 20:56, Aug 22, 2004 (CEST)
**I support as well, with the condition that someone adds a little more TOS info as well. -- [[User:SmokeDetector47|SmokeDetector47]] 21:31, 22 Aug 2004 (CEST)
**Supported as well. Good work! :) [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 12:24, 23 Aug 2004 (CEST)
==Nominations with objections==
==Nominations with objections==
<!--Add new nominations on top, one section per nomination.-->
*[[Hikaru Sulu]]. I think all information available has been included. I really wouldn't know what else there can be told. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 21:07, 1 Sep 2004 (CEST)
**Oppose - most of the 'Later Career' section has nothing to do with Sulu at all, simply a regurgitation of what happened to the ''Enterprise''. If these were rewritten to reflect what ''Sulu'' did during the events in question, that would more likely garner my support. -- [[User:DarkHorizon|Michael Warren]] | [[User talk:DarkHorizon|''Talk'']] 21:16, Sep 1, 2004 (CEST)
***You are probably right that there should be more a focuss upon Sulu there. Though, Sulu didn't exactly do much notable until ''The Undiscovered Country''. In most of the motion pictures, he was "just there", not really playing a major role in the story... [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 18:49, 2 Sep 2004 (CEST)
****Really? Star Trek III, helped with the breakout of McCoy ("Don't call me Tiny"); Star Trek IV, Sulu assisted Scotty and McCoy, piloting a Huey that delivered the vital transparent aluminum components; Star Trek V, Sulu piloted the shuttle down to Paradise City, and the notable dash back to the ''Enterprise''-A ("B! As in 'Barricade'!"), was taken over by Sybok's mind control, etc, etc. These are all things that should be in the article. Even just saying he was part of X is important. -- [[User:DarkHorizon|Michael Warren]] | [[User talk:DarkHorizon|''Talk'']] 18:56, Sep 2, 2004 (CEST)
*[[Klingon Empire]] It still needs a lot of references, and information on the events after the Khitomer Accords, but already this article is IMO extensive and detailed enough to be featured. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 11:57, 25 Aug 2004 (CEST)
**Although the article is indeed a good one, we still need more info about the Klingons in the TNG era, and the Klingons' their role in the Dominion War... Objected. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 12:55, 25 Aug 2004 (CEST)
*[[Seven of Nine]]: Most of the article is to [[User:A peckover]]'s credit. I think it's good work and worth to be featured. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 01:36, Aug 26, 2004 (CEST)
**Not voting for or against as I'm biased, but thanks BlueMars. :-) [[User:A peckover|Alex Peckover]] 08:39, Aug 26, 2004 (CEST)
**Opposed. Still needs alot of work. What about her relationship to that drone, created by her nanoprobes and the mobile emitter, for one thing. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 13:08, 26 Aug 2004 (CEST)
***If you want, Redge, I would be happy to improve the article based on a few suggestions from yourself (or others). [[User:A peckover|Alex Peckover]] 15:29, Aug 26, 2004 (CEST)
****I could sum a few facts up from the top of my head, but throughout the series, paragraphs of more information on Seven is to be found, and I wouldn't know where to begin. I suggest an extensive desciption of the story of her and the drone I mentioned, and a more elaborate description of her relationship with the doctor and her social lessons, to start with. Of course, there's much more, I'm just summing a few things up off the top of my head. It'll take a lot more info before it is ready to be featured, IMO. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 16:39, 26 Aug 2004 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 14:27, 9 April 2020

Memory Alpha  AboutPolicies and guidelinesFA policiesFA criteria → Featured article nominations

This page is for the nomination and discussion of articles that may be potentially included in Memory Alpha's list of featured articles. A featured article is an especially well-written, informative, and comprehensive article that covers all available information on a subject. If you feel one of our articles meets this criteria, you may suggest it here in accordance with the nomination policy. For a list of articles previously nominated, see the archive.

To bring up a current featured article for review, please see the review procedure.

To nominate an article, start a new discussion under "Nominations without objections" with a heading named for the article you want to suggest. Provide an appropriate picture and a two- to three-paragraph summary of the article. This is usually the article's lead-in if possible, and should not contain any links, except to the article itself. This is what will be displayed on the main page and in the portals if the nomination is successful. Followed that by a brief reason why you feel the article should be featured.

Sample format:

=== <article> ===
'''[[<article>]]''' <summary>
<reasoning> - <signature>

Once this is done, a notice that the article has been nominated as a featured article candidate should be added to the article in question by inserting {{fan}} at the top of the page, above any other templates except the article type template.

When you are commenting on a nomination, please take the time to read the entire article before you decide whether to Support or Oppose the nomination. Nominations with objections should be moved to the appropriate section until they are resolved.

When supporting or opposing an article, please use a bullet point (by adding a * before your comment) without any indent so these will be easy to find later. General comments should be indented as usual, and, as always, please sign your nominations and comments with "~~~~".

Nominations without objections

Nominations with objections

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.