m (+martok)
m (rm 2, 1 pass 1 fail)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Nominations without objections==
==Nominations without objections==
<!--Add new nominations on top, one section per nomination.-->
* [[Martok]]: Thanks to [[User:MinutiaeMan]] for this detailed article. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 14:18, Sep 12, 2004 (CEST)
* [[Trelane]]: My compliments to [[User:Balok|Balok]] for writing an extraordinarily entertaining article. One of the best examples of the [[Memory Alpha:inform and entertain|inform and entertain]] policy that I've seen so far. Very well done! -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 01:54, Sep 12, 2004 (CEST)
*[[James T. Kirk]]: Well written and detailed article. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 19:57, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST)
** Definitely support. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 20:57, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST)
*[[Klingon Empire]] It still needs a lot of references, and information on the events after the Khitomer Accords, but already this article is IMO extensive and detailed enough to be featured. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 11:57, 25 Aug 2004 (CEST)
**<del>Although the article is indeed a good one, we still need more info about the Klingons in the TNG era, and the Klingons' their role in the Dominion War... Objected.</del> [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 12:55, 25 Aug 2004 (CEST)
*** I believe that this issue has been taken care of with my recent contributions, so I'm moving this nomination back to the "no objections" section. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 14:09, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST)
**<del>Oppose for now. IMO it's not "historical" enough, it needs to have a bit more perspective on this great alien superpower.</del> -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 02:16, Sep 3, 2004 (CEST)
*** Whoops, I confused [[Klingon Empire]] with [[Klingon]]! Eek! I still don't think that this article is ready to be featured, but that's simply because it's not completed. I did the vast majority of the first part of the article, but never got around to finishing it. IMO, rather than having links to other articles for the remaining sections, there needs to at least be a few paragraphs added. I'll get to that sometime tomorrow, probably. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 16:29, Sep 5, 2004 (CEST)
**Seconded. After some additional contributions this is an excellent article. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 22:49, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST)
** I've fleshed out the remaining part of this article (from post-ST6 on through the Dominion War). Since this article is pretty much my baby, I definitely support it! ;-) -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 14:12, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST)
** '''Holding''' this nomination pending support from Ottens. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 02:33, Sep 12, 2004 (CEST)
==Nominations with objections==
==Nominations with objections==
<!--Add new nominations on top, one section per nomination.-->

Latest revision as of 14:27, 9 April 2020

Memory Alpha  AboutPolicies and guidelinesFA policiesFA criteria → Featured article nominations

This page is for the nomination and discussion of articles that may be potentially included in Memory Alpha's list of featured articles. A featured article is an especially well-written, informative, and comprehensive article that covers all available information on a subject. If you feel one of our articles meets this criteria, you may suggest it here in accordance with the nomination policy. For a list of articles previously nominated, see the archive.

To bring up a current featured article for review, please see the review procedure.

To nominate an article, start a new discussion under "Nominations without objections" with a heading named for the article you want to suggest. Provide an appropriate picture and a two- to three-paragraph summary of the article. This is usually the article's lead-in if possible, and should not contain any links, except to the article itself. This is what will be displayed on the main page and in the portals if the nomination is successful. Followed that by a brief reason why you feel the article should be featured.

Sample format:

=== <article> ===
'''[[<article>]]''' <summary>
<reasoning> - <signature>

Once this is done, a notice that the article has been nominated as a featured article candidate should be added to the article in question by inserting {{fan}} at the top of the page, above any other templates except the article type template.

When you are commenting on a nomination, please take the time to read the entire article before you decide whether to Support or Oppose the nomination. Nominations with objections should be moved to the appropriate section until they are resolved.

When supporting or opposing an article, please use a bullet point (by adding a * before your comment) without any indent so these will be easy to find later. General comments should be indented as usual, and, as always, please sign your nominations and comments with "~~~~".

Nominations without objections

Nominations with objections

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.