m (rm 2, 1 pass 1 fail)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Nominations without objections==
==Nominations without objections==
<!--When moving nominations to this section, add to top.-->
[[Saucer separation]] -- I think this page shows all the information you could think of about saucer separation. It also contains background information that I found very interesting. The pictures used back up the text, and enhance certain points. [[User:Zsingaya|zsingaya]] 02:14, 1 Apr 2005 (EST)
[[Storm Front, Part I]] -- thorough summary of episode, with informative pictures that show all the major characters (with the exception of the regular crew, of course!) --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] | [[User talk:Defiant|''Talk'']] 13:42, 27 Mar 2005 (EST)
:'''Support''' -- An excellent article, just like all of Defiant's other episode summaries -- [[User:Rebelstrike2005|Rebelstrike2005]] 04:58, 28 Mar 2005 (EST)
[[Galaxy class]] -- renominated after removal of status according to FARC policy (see also: [[Memory Alpha talk:Nominations for featured articles]]). ''Note: At the moment, I'm neither supporting nor objecting to this nomination. Two additional supporting votes will be necessary.'' -- [[User:Cid Highwind|Cid Highwind]] 04:31, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)
:'''Support'''-- [[User:Rebelstrike2005|Rebelstrike2005]] 13:51, 25 Mar 2005 (EST)
:'''Support''' [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 07:15, 26 Mar 2005 (EST)
[[Delta Flyer]] - Very thorough, with stats, images and text. --[[User:Dalen|Dalen]] 11:16, 19 Mar 2005 (EST)
:'''Support''' [[User:Rebelstrike2005|Rebelstrike2005]] 08:31, 20 Mar 2005 (EST)
:'''Support''' Good article. Sole objection: I would recommend a better/higher quality image of the Delta Flyer. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 08:35, 20 Mar 2005 (EST)
: '''Support''' — [[User:Pd THOR|THOR]] 14:37, 23 Mar 2005 (EST)
==Nominations with objections==
==Nominations with objections==
<!--When moving nominations to this section, add to top.-->
[[Pattern enhancer]] -- ''self-nomination'', the first article I worked on in '''MA''' — [[User:Pd THOR|THOR]] 14:51, 23 Mar 2005 (EST)
:'''Oppose''' - I think there should be a ''complete'' list of Appearances, and possibly even a full list of References. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] | [[User talk:Defiant|''Talk'']] 05:56, 26 Mar 2005 (EST)
:'''Oppose''' for now. It's an excellent article, but indeed needs a complete list of appearences. Also references should be included. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 04:29, 27 Mar 2005 (EST)

Latest revision as of 14:27, 9 April 2020

Memory Alpha  AboutPolicies and guidelinesFA policiesFA criteria → Featured article nominations

This page is for the nomination and discussion of articles that may be potentially included in Memory Alpha's list of featured articles. A featured article is an especially well-written, informative, and comprehensive article that covers all available information on a subject. If you feel one of our articles meets this criteria, you may suggest it here in accordance with the nomination policy. For a list of articles previously nominated, see the archive.

To bring up a current featured article for review, please see the review procedure.

To nominate an article, start a new discussion under "Nominations without objections" with a heading named for the article you want to suggest. Provide an appropriate picture and a two- to three-paragraph summary of the article. This is usually the article's lead-in if possible, and should not contain any links, except to the article itself. This is what will be displayed on the main page and in the portals if the nomination is successful. Followed that by a brief reason why you feel the article should be featured.

Sample format:

=== <article> ===
'''[[<article>]]''' <summary>
<reasoning> - <signature>

Once this is done, a notice that the article has been nominated as a featured article candidate should be added to the article in question by inserting {{fan}} at the top of the page, above any other templates except the article type template.

When you are commenting on a nomination, please take the time to read the entire article before you decide whether to Support or Oppose the nomination. Nominations with objections should be moved to the appropriate section until they are resolved.

When supporting or opposing an article, please use a bullet point (by adding a * before your comment) without any indent so these will be easy to find later. General comments should be indented as usual, and, as always, please sign your nominations and comments with "~~~~".

Nominations without objections

Nominations with objections

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.