(Nominations without objections: +USS Excelsior)
m (rm 2, 1 pass 1 fail)
(1,210 intermediate revisions by 66 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Nominations without objections==
==Nominations without objections==
==[[USS Excelsior]]==
Extremely well-written, well-organized and (as far as I can tell) complete article for one of the most famous [[starship]]s in ''Trek'' history. Also, it's not over-long or over-detailed as some articles tend to be; an easy read, yet it's informative, interesting and comprehensive. It has a decent background section, as well. And yes, I skipped the whole Peer Review crap because, let's be honest... it would be a waste of time. If someone sees something they think needs fixing during this nomination process, they can fix it. Having said that – '''have at it!''' --[[User:Shran|From Andoria with Love]] 04:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support''' (duh) --[[User:Shran|From Andoria with Love]] 04:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
This article has been undergoing peer review for the past month and a half (see: [[Talk:Quark's/peerreview]]), and all of the comments received have been incredibly positive. All posters of comments in the peer review also explicitly said that they'd support the article if it was nominated for FA. The article content has not been disputed, with all contributions for at least the past year simply being minor formatting changes or additions of extra information to make the article even more comprehensive. I think it's reached a point now where it fulfils the [[Memory Alpha:Featured article criteria|Featured article criteria]] quite nicely, and think it deserves to be an FA! – [[User:Taduolus|Taduolus]] 12:36, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
:'''Support''' - Ridiculously comprehensive and entertaining. Exactly the kind of thing we're looking for in FA.– [[User:Cleanse|Cleanse]] 13:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
:'''Support''': Excellent article. My favorite was the section on the not-so-often discussed history of Quark's under the Caardassians. I do think we should add in the part about when the DSN9 crew, sucked into Odo's mind, have a dream that they are warped back in time and then perform work at Quark's. It might already be in there somewhere, though. -[[User:FleetCaptain|FC]] 13:50, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
'''Comment''': Added :o) – [[User:Taduolus|Taduolus]] 15:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
:'''Support''': As I said on the Peer Review, it is a great article. I also like all of the quotes at the top of the sections. Really brings context to the section. ----[[User:Mainphramephreak|<span style="color:#00FFFF;"> '''Willie'''</span>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Mainphramephreak|<span style="color:#FF7000;"> '''LLAP'''</span>]]</sup> 14:13, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
:'''Support'''. Well done, comprehensive, informative, and organized. No question it should be a featured article.--[[User:31dot|31dot]] 20:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
:'''Support'''. As I said, excellent article &ndash; [[User:Bertaut|Bertaut]] <sup>[[User Talk:Bertaut|<span style="color:#FFFF00;">talk</span>]]</sup> 02:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
:'''Support'''. Almost nominated it myself when I was fixing a minor spelling error a week or so ago. Definitely deserves FA status, for all the reasons listed above. - [[User:Bridge|Bridge]] 14:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
:'''Support. --- [[User:Jaz|Jaz]] 17:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
:'''Support''' beautifully written.--[[User:UESPArules|Long Live the United Earth]] 20:57, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
:'''Support'''. A great article and a good one for representing Memory Alpha. &ndash; [[User:ThomasHL|Tom]] 12:01, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
This is the second time I've nominayed this for FA status. The first time around it got two one supports and no objections. It's also been on peer review for some time now, and again, I've got no negative feedback on it. As [[User:Taduolus|Taduolus]] has pointed out, it's hard to see anything that significant that could be added to the article to actually improve it any further, so I thought I'd give it another go at nomination. &ndash; [[User:Bertaut|Bertaut]] <sup>[[User Talk:Bertaut|<span style="color:#FFFF00;">talk</span>]]</sup> 02:49, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. Let's not leave Bertaut high and dry this time. The guy does too much work around here for that. --[[User:OuroborosCobra|OuroborosCobra]] <sup>[[User Talk:OuroborosCobra|<span style="color:#00FF00;">talk</span>]]</sup> 04:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support''' - extensive background information and well illustrated. Exactly what we're looking for in an episode article.&ndash; [[User:Cleanse|Cleanse]] 11:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support''' - Very good article. I know I'm repeating myself from the Peer Review, but the background section is great. ----[[User:Mainphramephreak|<span style="color:#00FFFF;"> '''Willie'''</span>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Mainphramephreak|<span style="color:#FF7000;"> '''LLAP'''</span>]]</sup> 13:25, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. I agree, the background section is very comprehensive. - [[User:Bridge|Bridge]] 14:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
'''Comment''' - Very kind of you to say OuroborosCobra, and thanks to everyone else for their support too. &ndash; [[User:Bertaut|Bertaut]] <sup>[[User Talk:Bertaut|<span style="color:#FFFF00;">talk</span>]]</sup> 15:27, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support''' - For all of the reasons I gave in my Peer Review comments. There's no question that this great piece of work should be Featured! &ndash; [[User:Taduolus|Taduolus]] 15:51, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. A perfect example for an episode article. Well done. &ndash; [[User:ThomasHL|Tom]] 12:01, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
==Nominations with objections==
==Nominations with objections==

Latest revision as of 14:27, April 9, 2020

Memory Alpha  AboutPolicies and guidelinesFA policiesFA criteria → Featured article nominations

This page is for the nomination and discussion of articles that may be potentially included in Memory Alpha's list of featured articles. A featured article is an especially well-written, informative, and comprehensive article that covers all available information on a subject. If you feel one of our articles meets this criteria, you may suggest it here in accordance with the nomination policy. For a list of articles previously nominated, see the archive.

To bring up a current featured article for review, please see the review procedure.

To nominate an article, start a new discussion under "Nominations without objections" with a heading named for the article you want to suggest. Provide an appropriate picture and a two- to three-paragraph summary of the article. This is usually the article's lead-in if possible, and should not contain any links, except to the article itself. This is what will be displayed on the main page and in the portals if the nomination is successful. Followed that by a brief reason why you feel the article should be featured.

Sample format:

=== <article> ===
'''[[<article>]]''' <summary>
<reasoning> - <signature>

Once this is done, a notice that the article has been nominated as a featured article candidate should be added to the article in question by inserting {{fan}} at the top of the page, above any other templates except the article type template.

When you are commenting on a nomination, please take the time to read the entire article before you decide whether to Support or Oppose the nomination. Nominations with objections should be moved to the appropriate section until they are resolved.

When supporting or opposing an article, please use a bullet point (by adding a * before your comment) without any indent so these will be easy to find later. General comments should be indented as usual, and, as always, please sign your nominations and comments with "~~~~".

Nominations without objectionsEdit

Nominations with objectionsEdit

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.