(→Nominations without objections: Nominatred "Jonathan Archer" article) |
(added an opposing vote to "Jonathan Archer" nomination, moving it to appropriate section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{FeatNom}} |
{{FeatNom}} |
||
==Nominations without objections== |
==Nominations without objections== |
||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | |||
'''[[Jonathan Archer]]''' |
'''[[Jonathan Archer]]''' |
||
I'd like to put the article, Jonathan Archer, up for nomination simply because it's a very well-written article and fully comprehensive. As far as I can tell, it includes everything about the man aswell as a nice background section. -- [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] <sup>[[User Talk:TrekFan|<span style="color:#00FF00;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 15:38, January 21, 2011 (UTC) |
I'd like to put the article, Jonathan Archer, up for nomination simply because it's a very well-written article and fully comprehensive. As far as I can tell, it includes everything about the man aswell as a nice background section. -- [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] <sup>[[User Talk:TrekFan|<span style="color:#00FF00;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 15:38, January 21, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| + | *'''Objection''': Some of the background notes require citations. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] 16:10, January 21, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
Revision as of 16:10, 21 January 2011
Template:FeatNom
Nominations without objections
Nominations with objections
I'd like to put the article, Jonathan Archer, up for nomination simply because it's a very well-written article and fully comprehensive. As far as I can tell, it includes everything about the man aswell as a nice background section. -- TrekFan Talk 15:38, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Objection: Some of the background notes require citations. --Defiant 16:10, January 21, 2011 (UTC)