(→Nominations with objections: -Hikaru Sulu and Seven of Nine (unsuccessful nominations after >10 days)) |
(→Nominations without objections: - Battle of the Omarion Nebula, -Ezri Dax, -Klingon (successful nominations)) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*[[James T. Kirk]]: Well written and detailed article. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 19:57, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST) |
*[[James T. Kirk]]: Well written and detailed article. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 19:57, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST) |
||
** Definitely support. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 20:57, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST) |
** Definitely support. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 20:57, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST) |
||
| − | |||
| − | * [[Battle of the Omarion Nebula]]: This article is the result of a true joint effort between several registered and anonymous contributors. I think it does a great job of summarizing the events of the episode. (I did some minor copyediting on this article myself.) -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 16:16, Sep 5, 2004 (CEST) |
||
| − | **Before I vote, I would like someone to get those pics in a bit better. They are in a rather chaotic order right now. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 16:43, 5 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
||
| − | *** What the heck is wrong with the pictures, and why should their order affect your vote? I don't want to sound condescending, but that doesn't make sense to me. (No offense intended!) -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 11:07, Sep 6, 2004 (CEST) |
||
| − | ****Well excuse me, but I happen to feel a good, featurable article, has not only a well written body, but also a good appendix, references and pictures, all in a readable format. In this article, headers and pictures are crossing, creating a chaotic effect that effects the readability of this article. Since this only a minor fault and can easily be mended, I'm not voting against, but holding off my vote untill the pictures are resorted and the article IMO ready to be featured. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 14:09, 6 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | ****** There you go. Second. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 14:35, 6 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
||
| − | **I don't want to sound petty, but I wrote almost all the text of the article's current version. Not to minimize other people's contributions but I put a lot of work into this and I'd like to be acknowledged for that. Aside from that, thanks for the nomination! -- [[User:EtaPiscium|EtaPiscium]] | [[User talk:EtaPiscium|Talk]] 15:01, Sep 5, 2004 (CEST) |
||
| − | *** My mistake, EtaPiscium! I was looking at the article's history page and neglected to check the diffs. Sorry about that! -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 11:07, Sep 6, 2004 (CEST) |
||
| − | **Supported. Good work! [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 11:24, 6 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
||
| − | **seconded. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 19:57, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST) |
||
| − | |||
| − | *[[Ezri Dax]] -- Self-nomination. Having ''finally'' finished this article, I present it to be nominated as a feature article. Packed to the gills, this one is! I've detailed Ezri's involvement in every episode of [[DS9 Season 7]], which was quite substantial... -- [[User:DarkHorizon|Michael Warren]] | [[User talk:DarkHorizon|''Talk'']] 00:25, Sep 3, 2004 (CEST) |
||
| − | **Seconded. Good work! --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 00:26, Sep 3, 2004 (CEST) |
||
| − | ** Definitely support! -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 02:16, Sep 3, 2004 (CEST) |
||
| − | ** Definately supported. Though I would suggest making sub-titles in the article, so it's a little more clear... [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 11:10, 4 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
||
| − | **Support. Great work! -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 16:43, 5 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
||
| − | |||
| − | *[[Klingon]]: With the help of various people a detailed article has been created here. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 01:42, Aug 26, 2004 (CEST) |
||
| − | **Enough information, not too long: Second. Although I would gather the various traditions and rituals spread throughout the article and put them together under a single header. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 13:08, 26 Aug 2004 (CEST) |
||
*[[Klingon Empire]] It still needs a lot of references, and information on the events after the Khitomer Accords, but already this article is IMO extensive and detailed enough to be featured. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 11:57, 25 Aug 2004 (CEST) |
*[[Klingon Empire]] It still needs a lot of references, and information on the events after the Khitomer Accords, but already this article is IMO extensive and detailed enough to be featured. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 11:57, 25 Aug 2004 (CEST) |
||
| Line 35: | Line 15: | ||
**Seconded. After some additional contributions this is an excellent article. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 22:49, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST) |
**Seconded. After some additional contributions this is an excellent article. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 22:49, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST) |
||
** I've fleshed out the remaining part of this article (from post-ST6 on through the Dominion War). Since this article is pretty much my baby, I definitely support it! ;-) -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 14:12, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST) |
** I've fleshed out the remaining part of this article (from post-ST6 on through the Dominion War). Since this article is pretty much my baby, I definitely support it! ;-) -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 14:12, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
==Nominations with objections== |
==Nominations with objections== |
||
Revision as of 00:33, 12 September 2004
Template:FeatNom
Nominations without objections
- Trelane: My compliments to Balok for writing an extraordinarily entertaining article. One of the best examples of the inform and entertain policy that I've seen so far. Very well done! -- Dan Carlson | Talk 01:54, Sep 12, 2004 (CEST)
- James T. Kirk: Well written and detailed article. --BlueMars 19:57, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST)
- Definitely support. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 20:57, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST)
- Klingon Empire It still needs a lot of references, and information on the events after the Khitomer Accords, but already this article is IMO extensive and detailed enough to be featured. -- Redge | Talk 11:57, 25 Aug 2004 (CEST)
Although the article is indeed a good one, we still need more info about the Klingons in the TNG era, and the Klingons' their role in the Dominion War... Objected.Ottens 12:55, 25 Aug 2004 (CEST)- I believe that this issue has been taken care of with my recent contributions, so I'm moving this nomination back to the "no objections" section. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 14:09, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST)
Oppose for now. IMO it's not "historical" enough, it needs to have a bit more perspective on this great alien superpower.-- Dan Carlson | Talk 02:16, Sep 3, 2004 (CEST)- Whoops, I confused Klingon Empire with Klingon! Eek! I still don't think that this article is ready to be featured, but that's simply because it's not completed. I did the vast majority of the first part of the article, but never got around to finishing it. IMO, rather than having links to other articles for the remaining sections, there needs to at least be a few paragraphs added. I'll get to that sometime tomorrow, probably. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 16:29, Sep 5, 2004 (CEST)
- Seconded. After some additional contributions this is an excellent article. --BlueMars 22:49, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST)
- I've fleshed out the remaining part of this article (from post-ST6 on through the Dominion War). Since this article is pretty much my baby, I definitely support it! ;-) -- Dan Carlson | Talk 14:12, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST)
- Holding this nomination pending support from Ottens. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 02:33, Sep 12, 2004 (CEST)