(+damar) |
Ryan123450 (talk | contribs) m (damar) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<!--Add new nominations on top, one section per nomination.--> |
<!--Add new nominations on top, one section per nomination.--> |
||
* [[Damar]]. Well written, detailed info. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 13:13, Sep 17, 2004 (CEST) |
* [[Damar]]. Well written, detailed info. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 13:13, Sep 17, 2004 (CEST) |
||
| + | ::I rewrote this article a few months ago. It needs a little expanision but I'd still say, SUPPORT. [[User:Ryan123450|Ryan123450]] 18:26, 17 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
||
* [[Benjamin Sisko]]: Self-nomination. I've worked slowly on this for a couple of weeks or so, and frankly gave up. It's still pretty weak regarding his role as the Emissary, particularly the final few seasons. It's still extremely informative. If a few other people tweak it, it will be amazing. [[User:Ryan123450|Ryan123450]] 05:56, 15 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
* [[Benjamin Sisko]]: Self-nomination. I've worked slowly on this for a couple of weeks or so, and frankly gave up. It's still pretty weak regarding his role as the Emissary, particularly the final few seasons. It's still extremely informative. If a few other people tweak it, it will be amazing. [[User:Ryan123450|Ryan123450]] 05:56, 15 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
||
Revision as of 16:26, 17 September 2004
Template:FeatNom
Nominations without objections
- I rewrote this article a few months ago. It needs a little expanision but I'd still say, SUPPORT. Ryan123450 18:26, 17 Sep 2004 (CEST)
- Benjamin Sisko: Self-nomination. I've worked slowly on this for a couple of weeks or so, and frankly gave up. It's still pretty weak regarding his role as the Emissary, particularly the final few seasons. It's still extremely informative. If a few other people tweak it, it will be amazing. Ryan123450 05:56, 15 Sep 2004 (CEST)
- I believe all relevant information has been discussed. Supported Ottens 10:49, 15 Sep 2004 (CEST)
- Certainly support. --BlueMars 23:29, Sep 15, 2004 (CEST)
- Cardassian Rebellion. Self-nomination. IMO a pretty thorough treatment of the issues and causes of the rebellion, and a blow-by-blow account of pretty much everything we saw them do during the Final Chapter. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 22:04, Sep 14, 2004 (CEST)
- Support. Excellent. Ryan123450 05:56, 15 Sep 2004 (CEST)
- Excellent and detailed work. Supported, definately. Ottens 10:49, 15 Sep 2004 (CEST)
- Support. --BlueMars 23:30, Sep 15, 2004 (CEST)
- Martok: Thanks to User:MinutiaeMan for this detailed article. --BlueMars 14:18, Sep 12, 2004 (CEST)
- Support, of course. Thanks, BlueMars! -- Dan Carlson | Talk 14:49, Sep 12, 2004 (CEST)
- Very well written. Supported. Ottens 10:49, 15 Sep 2004 (CEST)
- Trelane: My compliments to Balok for writing an extraordinarily entertaining article. One of the best examples of the inform and entertain policy that I've seen so far. Very well done! -- Dan Carlson | Talk 01:54, Sep 12, 2004 (CEST)
- All information available has been discussed, I think. It's quite amusing. Supported! Ottens 10:49, 15 Sep 2004 (CEST)
- James T. Kirk: Well written and detailed article. --BlueMars 19:57, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST)
- Definitely support. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 20:57, Sep 8, 2004 (CEST)
- Supported. Ottens 10:49, 15 Sep 2004 (CEST)