AndreMcKay (talk | contribs) (→[[Julian Bashir, Secret Agent]]: Support) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===[[Julian Bashir, Secret Agent]]=== |
===[[Julian Bashir, Secret Agent]]=== |
||
Several people, including [[User:Defiant|Defiant]], [[User:Vedek Dukat|Vedek Dukat]], [[User:Weyoun|Weyoun]] and [[User:Excelsior|Excelsior]], have done a good job on the page. Informative and well written. -- [[User:Tough Little Ship|Tough Little Ship]] 22:30, 26 May 2006 (UTC) |
Several people, including [[User:Defiant|Defiant]], [[User:Vedek Dukat|Vedek Dukat]], [[User:Weyoun|Weyoun]] and [[User:Excelsior|Excelsior]], have done a good job on the page. Informative and well written. -- [[User:Tough Little Ship|Tough Little Ship]] 22:30, 26 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
+ | :'''Support''' - Article is well written and covers the topic throughly--[[User:AndreMcKay|AndreMcKay]] 22:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
==Nominations without objections== |
==Nominations without objections== |
Revision as of 22:39, 26 May 2006
Template:FeatNom
Julian Bashir, Secret Agent
Several people, including Defiant, Vedek Dukat, Weyoun and Excelsior, have done a good job on the page. Informative and well written. -- Tough Little Ship 22:30, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Support - Article is well written and covers the topic throughly--AndreMcKay 22:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Nominations without objections
Nominations with objections
Romulan history
A really good read! I think it fits all the criteria for featured status. --Defiant 16:59, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment -- it seems to me that it could use some 'see also' bits to other history articles perhaps. -- Sulfur 17:16, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment -- I didn't peer review the article, because I'm not willing and too busy to make much changes to it myself but I think it's a good candidate. --Defiant 17:26, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Mild oppose. The article lacks some obvious links and I don't think the writing is up to par. The sections on the Awakening could be expanded, and there is no mention on the Underground/Re-unification movement during the 24th century. Logan 5 23:52, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Agree completely with the above statements, especially regarding the re-unification movement. I also believe many of the points could be expanded with additional detail. -- Dmsdbo 23:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)