(→‎Nominations without objections: removed nomination for Hope and Fear - article is now featured)
Line 3: Line 3:
==Nominations without objections==
==Nominations without objections==
<!--When moving nominations to this section, add to top.-->
<!--When moving nominations to this section, add to top.-->
;[[Hope and Fear]]: '''(self nomination)''' An article about the episode of [[Star Trek: Voyager]]. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] | [[User talk:Defiant|''Talk'']] 02:16, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:*'''Support''' --[[User:AmdrBoltz|AmdrBoltz]] 02:24, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:*'''Support''' --[[User:Scimitar|Scimitar]] 12:36, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:*'''Support''', although it looks like it could use another picture or two. Just an opinion, especially when you take into account pages are only saposed to have one or two pictures apparently ;-) --[[User:AJHalliwell|AJHalliwell]] 22:41, 3 Jul 2005 (UTC)
:*'''Support''', another exquisite [[User:Defiant|Defiant]] episode summary; excellent image usage! — [[User:Pd THOR|THOR]] 20:21, 4 Jul 2005 (UTC)
==Nominations with objections==
==Nominations with objections==

Revision as of 22:45, 4 July 2005


Nominations without objections

Nominations with objections

Enrique Muniz
It seems to have everything about the character included. Tough Little Ship 16:19, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose. At least for now. It Definitely needs at least one picture, and it could probably mention something about his Spanish heritage and maybe something about his childhood (I think he might have said something about it when he was hallucinating in "The Ship".) If not, then ignore that part. -AJHalliwell 16:54, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The picture issue has been addressed, but there's still something about the article that still gets me. As I can't articulate exactly what that is though, it would be unfair to oppose this, so I Abstain. -AJHalliwell 02:42, 29 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Support now that I added a picture. AmdrBoltz 18:47, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose -- Although it appears to have already been given featured status, I might add that there is very little mentioned about his relationship with O'Brien, which was fairly well established in "The Ship" and to some extent "Starship Down" - inc. O'Brien taking him under his "wing" and the jabs and such. To me, that does not seem to fully explore the potential of this article, it just states a chonological order of events, which basically says "blah", not "prime example". --Gvsualan 08:40, 4 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Rigelian. It's short, but I think that's everything. Jaf 19:15, 2 Jul 2005 (UTC)

  • Strongly oppose. It may be complete, but it's barely a paragraph in length. You honestly consider this "one of the best examples of the Memory Alpha community's work"? I certainly don't. -- Michael Warren | Talk 20:28, 3 Jul 2005 (UTC)
  • I didn't think length was a factor. Jaf 21:48, 3 Jul 2005 (UTC)Jaf
  • Mildly oppose Something about this does seem incomplete, even if it does contain all the information. -AJHalliwell 22:41, 3 Jul 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose. I agree that it's complete yet incomplete.--Scimitar 22:49, 3 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Apollo, seems to be complete. Jaf 16:33, 2 Jul 2005 (UTC)

  • Oppose. Completeness does not a featured article make. The sectioning seems rather haphazard, and the article would be served better if these were stripped. Information re: the Greek "gods" and their history would be served better on a page of their own - page should deal solely with Apollo and his personal history. In addition, the introduction should present the fact that Apollo was an alien being first, then deal with how his presence on Earth influenced the ancient Greeks and his role in the Greek pantheon. -- Michael Warren | Talk 20:28, 3 Jul 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose. As Michael said, completeness doesn't warrant becoming a featured article candidate. There's not much more that can be said for an osteogenic stimulator but someone would have to be having a laugh to nominate it for featured status.--Scimitar 22:49, 3 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Particle Fountain Project; looking complete to me. Jaf 01:39, 30 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Oppose - reads more like an episode summary than an encyclopedia entry. Needs grammar and POV check, and extraneous detail removed. -- Michael Warren | Talk 20:28, 3 Jul 2005 (UTC)
  • Mildly oppose - It does seem like the middle section of this is describing the episode, similar to the episode summaries we have as FA's. Agree with DarkHorizon. -AJHalliwell 22:41, 3 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.