(→‎Nominations with objections: archiving {{e|The 37's}} - two unresolved objections, sorry Defiant)
Line 3: Line 3:
==Nominations with objections==
==Nominations with objections==
;[[The 37's (episode)]]
:'''Self-nomination''': An interesting, concise summary, coupled with an extensive and insightful bg info section. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] 09:51, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
*Concise indeed, the summary is the same size as ''one'' of the background sections! That said, I'm not about to vote against an article on size alone, and the background more than makes up for any lack of finger to nose detail, so '''support'''. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 10:14, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. --[[User:Delta2373|Delta2373]] 11:52, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
* '''Comment'''/'''Oppose''': Everything about this article is perfect and the background is very thorough and detailed however, the summary section is not something I would call "the best example of MA work". First of all it is missing the "Teaser" and "Acts" etc and second it reads like someone rushed through it to get it over with. Like "they do this, and find that and then examine it and it doesnt work out so they wake everyone". A sentence like "They are told they were believed to be abducted by aliens from Earth in the 1930s, but they only seem to remember the day before" is awkward and grammatically questionable - entirely too many "theys" that could refer to anyone. The summary need a rewrite and polishing as it seems sloppy right now. Again, background and everything else are in "top form" so good job on that one, but I like the summary to be equally "top form" :) – [[User:Distantlycharmed|Distantlycharmed]] 17:56, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' for now: I'm afraid I agree with Distantly on this one. The summary should really follow the summaries of other episode articles to maintain a standard. It could also do with a re-write to address the points mentioned above. [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] <sup>[[User Talk:TrekFan|<span style="color:#00FF00;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 14:41, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
*'''Support''' - always good to see a long background section floating on a sea of citations.&ndash; [[User:Cleanse|Cleanse]] <small><sup>( [[User talk:Cleanse|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Cleanse|contribs]] )</sup></small> 00:28, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:47, 12 October 2010


Nominations without objections

Nominations with objections

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.