Line 12: Line 12:
*'''Oppose'' The refrences are messed up on the article 27 July 2005 [[User:Tobyk777]] (''Vote by anonymous user. Please log in before voting here. -- [[User:Cid Highwind|Cid Highwind]] 23:21, 27 Jul 2005 (UTC)'')
*'''Oppose'' The refrences are messed up on the article 27 July 2005 [[User:Tobyk777]] (''Vote by anonymous user. Please log in before voting here. -- [[User:Cid Highwind|Cid Highwind]] 23:21, 27 Jul 2005 (UTC)'')
* '''Self nomination'''. I think I've turned what was once a run-on single paragraph into a fine example of a Memory Alpha article. Not only does it cover all the onscreen facts, and is there by "Complete", but I believe it is worthy of the grand title of Featured Article. - [[User:AJHalliwell|AJHalliwell]]
*'''Support''' - I've corrected the spelling and grammar errors so pedantry won't get in the way of support for this article. Wonderfully written and exhaustive with a good choice of pictures to supplement the article.--[[User:Scimitar|Scimitar]] 22:28, 19 Jul 2005 (UTC)
* '''Oppose''' - temporarily. The citations should be placed in the article with the corresponding paragraph/sentence so the reader can identify the source with the content rather than a vague list at the bottom of the page of episodes they appeared it. Having not seen a majority of ENT season 3, I cannot make said changes. Otherwise I was in the process of giving it status when I made this observation. --[[User:Gvsualan|Alan del Beccio]] 07:27, 27 Jul 2005 (UTC)
** I cited the ep's, but should it get into redundant citing? As most of what we learned about the Aquatics come from the same 4 episodes or so, so to accurately cite each paragraph (or so) it'd get the same things over and over. - [[User:AJHalliwell|AJHalliwell]] 08:21, 27 Jul 2005 (UTC)
*** Only listing them at the bottom of the page, rather than within the article would be considered "redundant", if that is truely your concern. Otherwise, citing the episode with the corresponding blcok of information is a much easier for the reader to know ''precisely'' where the information is coming from. There are so many examples of this, I'm surprised I have to post an example, but for the sake of clarity, check out how [[Orion (species)]] is referenced. --[[User:Gvsualan|Alan del Beccio]] 08:58, 28 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:29, 28 July 2005


Nominations without objections

Nominations with objections

Reginald Barclay

  • Nominating because I believe that this article is complete, well written, and a great example of our work as a community. It works very well as a recurring character page. Mask 07:19, 27 Jul 2005 (UTC)

'Oppose- Its missing many minor things such as, the that Barclay de-evolved into a spider, the entire time he was affected by the alien probe, and hooked himself in teh the Enterprises computer, the fact that he does not play chess, but after the incident found a new incite for it. Also i believe on teh bottem that Barcloy doesn't stutter, they say he stammers? These are a few things that if taken care of I would change my vote. If not taken care of I'll try to see if i can fix. -Kahless 07:48, 27 Jul 2005 (UTC)

  • Oppose. Incomplete, such as mentioned above. Also, is Barclay earning of dividing sections? Not that this obviously has any requirement for featured, but I always think a page looks better with them. - AJHalliwell 08:21, 27 Jul 2005 (UTC)
  • 'Oppose The refrences are messed up on the article 27 July 2005 User:Tobyk777 (Vote by anonymous user. Please log in before voting here. -- Cid Highwind 23:21, 27 Jul 2005 (UTC))


  • I am nominating this acticle because it is a a nice long well written and documented article on the life and times of Data. I will admit Data is my favorite TNG character but after reading the article I love it it coudl use a very tiny amount of work but thsi nomination shoudl get that done. If not picked atleast it will turn this article into an even greater work and then maybe it coudl get a new nomination-Kahless 06:21, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Although I've composed most of the article, there are still some things lacking which are quite important: 1) More information on interests, such as painting and drama, 2) More information on friendship with LaForge. Ottens 07:29, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)
    • On number 1) I agree that this coudl be expanded abit but on 2) there is almsot as much written than in LaForges own Article. Those I still keep my nomination.-Kahless 08:02, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose. As Ottens said much more can be added to this article, epsecially on Data's interest in the arts and his friendship with Geordi.--Scimitar 08:54, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.