m (→‎Nominations without objections: Archived "Melora" nomination on article talk page)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{FeatNom}}[[Category:Memory Alpha maintenance|{{PAGENAME}}]]
{{FeatNom}}[[Category:Memory Alpha maintenance|{{PAGENAME}}]]
==Nominations without objections==
==Nominations without objections==
[[Memory Alpha:Nominations for featured articles/Archive#Melora (episode) (April 27, 2011)|Take]] [[Forum:Inclusion of websites that collate viewer ratings|two]]. --| [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] <sup>[[User Talk:TrekFan|<span style="color:#00FF00;">Open a channel</span>]]</sup> 09:28, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
* '''Support''' - This is an excellent article. The background information is comprehensive, well-written, and properly cited. It's also well-illustrated, which is always a plus.&ndash;[[User:Cleanse|Cleanse]] <small><sup>( [[User talk:Cleanse|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Cleanse|contribs]] )</sup></small> 09:57, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 10:00, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. - I like the balance between the main article and bginfo and I can appreciate the use of multiple sources for the bginfo - [[User:Sennim|Sennim]] 10:10, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
*'''Support''': I reckon there could be some more clarification in the summary (for example, a scene that contains two female characters currently refers to both as "she", etc., without referring to them more distinctly), but &ndash; other than that &ndash; this is a good effort. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] 10:46, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. - Well written and researched. [[User:ThomasHL|Tom]] 18:06, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
==Nominations with objections==
==Nominations with objections==

Revision as of 10:41, 24 May 2011


Nominations without objections

Nominations with objections

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.