Line 11: Line 11:
*'''Support''': Beautifully extensive. Well organized. --[[User:Werideatdusk|Werideatdusk]] 03:34, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)
*'''Support''': Beautifully extensive. Well organized. --[[User:Werideatdusk|Werideatdusk]] 03:34, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)
===[[Day of the Dove]]===
A moderately short but detailed summary with amazing background information. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant Administrator]] | [[User talk:Defiant|''Talk'']] 17:21, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)
*'''Support''' Good summary length and great ''meta''-Trek info. [[User:Logan 5|Logan 5]] 22:44, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
*'''Weak support'''. The BG info definitely needs to be organized somehow IMHO, but other than that, it looks good. ----[[User:Vedek Dukat|Vedek Dukat]] <sup> [[User talk:Vedek Dukat|<span style="color:red">Talk</span>]] | [[MemoryAlpha:User:Vedek Dukat/Episodes|<span style="color:gold;">Duty Roster</span>]]</sup> 18:47, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)
*'''Neutral'''. It's a good article, yes, but virtually every TOS episode has a wealth of background information on its MA page already. I don't oppose this, but I don't want to see every episode featured either. [[User:Makon|Makon]] 09:52, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)
*'''Strong Support'''. An extensive (but not ''too'' extensive), well-written summary and a great, detailed background section makes this yet another episode to add to our featured article list. :) --[[User:Shran|From Andoria with Love]] 13:16, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. Very good, concise, well-written synopsis. I wish every episode article were this well detailed. Featuring this would set an example. --[[User:Werideatdusk|Werideatdusk]] 03:34, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)
*'''Support''': Looks to me like it has just the right amount of summary and background info. Perhaps some more organization is needed, but that shouldn't be a reason for not featuring it.--[[User:Tim Thomason|Tim Thomason]] 18:55, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
*'''Support''': I agree with everything thats been said above, and the fact that lots of TOS episodes are already featured shouldn't be a point against it. [[{{ns:user}}:Zsingaya|<span style="color:#00FF00;">Zsingaya</span>]] <sup> [[User talk:Zsingaya|''Talk'']]</sup> 19:06, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
==Nominations with objections==
==Nominations with objections==

Revision as of 22:59, 29 December 2005


Nominations without objections

Robert Picardo

This is kind of a self-nomination, but I believe it deserves to be featured. As you can see, it is extensively detailed without (at least, to me) rambling on or going overboard. It pretty much offers everything you would ever want to known about Bob (and then some) without getting boring. I also like the layout and such; overall just a great article which I'm proud of, as should be everyone else who contributed to it. :) --From Andoria with Love 12:37, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)

  • Support. I think it's good to get more Trek actors as FAs and this one is thorough and well done. I do however wonder who's going to maintain the Current Projects area and wonder if that might be changed to Post-Trek projects so it doesn't need to maintained as much. Logan 5 17:35, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Support: I think the article is just the right length for a one of Star Trek's main credits stars. As Logan said, the writing is well-done, and its probably one of the best non-featured articles we have.--Tim Thomason 18:36, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment - RE: Logan 5 - We can all pitch in to assist with this, but I will personally return to the article once in a while to make sure that it is kept up-to-date. The projects listed in that section can be easily integrated into the other sections (or even removed, if need be). The same goes for any other performer's article who has a "Current projects" section (Rene Auberjonois, for example). :) --From Andoria with Love 03:22, 21 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Support: Beautifully extensive. Well organized. --Werideatdusk 03:34, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Nominations with objections

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.