(-[The Doctor]: featured)
Line 19: Line 19:
**I support as well, with the condition that someone adds a little more TOS info as well. -- [[User:SmokeDetector47|SmokeDetector47]] 21:31, 22 Aug 2004 (CEST)
**I support as well, with the condition that someone adds a little more TOS info as well. -- [[User:SmokeDetector47|SmokeDetector47]] 21:31, 22 Aug 2004 (CEST)
**Supported as well. Good work! :) [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 12:24, 23 Aug 2004 (CEST)
**Supported as well. Good work! :) [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 12:24, 23 Aug 2004 (CEST)
*[[The Doctor]]- An article I started, but numerous people have contributed to make it what is, I believe, a substantial article into the character. -- [[User:MiChaos|MiChaos]] 01:22, 20 Aug 2004 (CEST).
**There are still extensive details that need to be added - the Doctor's writings, his opera and the events of "Virtuoso", "Message in a Bottle", "Life Line", etc, all crucial moments for the character, but as yet unmentioned. I'm trying to add more to it now, but it's late here :) -- [[User:DarkHorizon|Michael Warren]] | [[User talk:DarkHorizon|''Talk'']] 01:41, Aug 20, 2004 (CEST)
***Oops, I'd forgotten those episodes due to having not seen them :). I've added some more info to the article, but I still feel it has so much detail it deserves to be featured. I'll do some more work on it, and I'll get back to you... -- [[User:MiChaos|MiChaos]] 03:06, 20 Aug 2004 (CEST).
**Seconded. If we keep this up this will be the longest article in the dbase. In any case, it's long enough to be featured already. -- [[User:Redge|Redge]] | [[User talk:Redge|''Talk'']] 19:56, 20 Aug 2004 (CEST)
**Seconded. However, i think we should add info on those episodes in the near future. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 13:06, Aug 21, 2004 (CEST)
==Nominations with objections==
==Nominations with objections==

Revision as of 14:42, 27 August 2004


Nominations without objections

  • Klingon: With the help of various people a detailed article has been created here. --BlueMars 01:42, Aug 26, 2004 (CEST)
    • Enough information, not too long: Second. Although I would gather the various traditions and rituals spread throughout the article and put them together under a single header. -- Redge | Talk 13:08, 26 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • Elim Garak: After User:Ryan123450 has added lots of good info, i would call that a featured article. my compliments Ryan. --BlueMars 17:01, Aug 25, 2004 (CEST)
    • I don't know. There is certainly enough info, but I'm mising a structure, a red line. I'll hold off my vote for now. -- Redge | Talk 13:08, 26 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • Beverly Crusher My compliments to SmokeDetector47, who single handedly changed this article from a stub to an IMO worthy featured article. -- Redge | Talk 11:22, 21 Aug 2004 (CEST)
    • Supported. Certainly. Good work! Ottens 12:07, 21 Aug 2004 (CEST)
    • Seconded. Very good work! --BlueMars 13:06, Aug 21, 2004 (CEST)
    • Gets my vote. Very detailed and very thorough. Alex Peckover 08:55, Aug 26, 2004 (CEST)
  • Sickbay, another article by the knowledgable SmokeDetector47, created overnight. Along with [{Crusher]] and [{The Doctor]], perhaps we should have a new category in the Featured Articles: Medical. -- Redge | Talk 14:18, 22 Aug 2004 (CEST)
    • Support. Certainly great work!. However, I think i'm gonna implement images of Defiant-class, Sovereign-class and Intrepid-class sickbays.--BlueMars 20:56, Aug 22, 2004 (CEST)
    • I support as well, with the condition that someone adds a little more TOS info as well. -- SmokeDetector47 21:31, 22 Aug 2004 (CEST)
    • Supported as well. Good work! :) Ottens 12:24, 23 Aug 2004 (CEST)

Nominations with objections

  • Klingon Empire It still needs a lot of references, and information on the events after the Khitomer Accords, but already this article is IMO extensive and detailed enough to be featured. -- Redge | Talk 11:57, 25 Aug 2004 (CEST)
    • Although the article is indeed a good one, we still need more info about the Klingons in the TNG era, and the Klingons' their role in the Dominion War... Objected. Ottens 12:55, 25 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • Seven of Nine: Most of the article is to User:A peckover's credit. I think it's good work and worth to be featured. --BlueMars 01:36, Aug 26, 2004 (CEST)
    • Not voting for or against as I'm biased, but thanks BlueMars. :-) Alex Peckover 08:39, Aug 26, 2004 (CEST)
    • Opposed. Still needs alot of work. What about her relationship to that drone, created by her nanoprobes and the mobile emitter, for one thing. -- Redge | Talk 13:08, 26 Aug 2004 (CEST)
      • If you want, Redge, I would be happy to improve the article based on a few suggestions from yourself (or others). Alex Peckover 15:29, Aug 26, 2004 (CEST)
        • I could sum a few facts up from the top of my head, but throughout the series, paragraphs of more information on Seven is to be found, and I wouldn't know where to begin. I suggest an extensive desciption of the story of her and the drone I mentioned, and a more elaborate description of her relationship with the doctor and her social lessons, to start with. Of course, there's much more, I'm just summing a few things up off the top of my head. It'll take a lot more info before it is ready to be featured, IMO. -- Redge | Talk 16:39, 26 Aug 2004 (CEST)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.