Line 3: Line 3:
==Nominations without objections==
==Nominations without objections==
<!--When moving nominations to this section, add to top.-->
<!--When moving nominations to this section, add to top.-->
I nominated, then pulled this nomination before on the suggestion that it go through peer-review. The participation there was low but I've done significant work on the article since then. For something that is mentioned or shown in practically every episode of every series I think this is about as complete as it can be. I've tried to organize it better, added quite bit of inormation to all the sections and some pics. I think it's pretty well written and reads well now, is thorough, and aside from my most recent changes for better organizaiton I think it's stable. For a vital piece of Trek I think we should give consideration to this nomination. [[User:Logan 5|Logan 5]] 15:47, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)
*'''Comment'''. I haven't gotten a chance to go through the nitty gritty stuff on the article yet (looks good), but I have noticed MA has a low participation rate on a lot of stuff, at least relative to its user population. --[[User:Broik|Broik]] 05:27, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
:Well, personally I think this is sad. It's a good article that at least deserves votes/attention. But frankly I think that it's too long for most users to read through. Which brings me back to my objection to some other FA nominations like Noah and Grathon Tolar. People read and vote on those because they are so short but won't read and vote on this because it is more involved. I just don't see who FAs can represent the best work of Memory Alpha when some articles that require the most work don't get read, and ones that require relatively little work get so much support. Sad. [[User:Logan 5|Logan 5]] 17:00, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. Incredibly detailed and informative. Me like. --[[User:Shran|From Andoria with Love]] 00:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
*<s>'''Conditional Support'''</s>. The first picture on the page doesn't cite what episode it came from. If it can be cited or replaced, I support. If not, it may be a copyvio, in which case I can definatly not support this nomination. [[User:Jaz|Jaz]] 00:52, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
:Replaced with image of a Galaxy class transporter room properly credited to Art of Star Trek. [[User:Logan 5|Logan 5]] 19:10, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. Amazingly informative, amazingly detailed, and definetly worthy of FA status. --[[{{ns:user}}:Starchild|<span style="color:#C0C0C0;">Starchild</span>]] <sup> |[[User talk:Starchild|<''Talk''>]]</sup> 04:13, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
**The new pic if from ''inside'' the Art of Star Trek, so I don't think it is fiar use. I am going to have to <strike>'''oppose'''</strike> until the image issues are resolved. [[User:Jaz|Jaz]] 01:20, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
***Say what? First, if this is the case then the [[Galaxy class]] page is in copy vio and needs to have it's FA status stripped. Second, if it's not usable then why hasn't it been deleted? Third, if you want to be such a stickler about such a minor detail and an easily corrected one, why not just correct it instead of opposing the nomination and standing in the way? I'm just going to remove the picture entirely, but going from conditional to oppose on that basis seems like an exercise in contrary-ism. [[User:Logan 5|Logan 5]] 14:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
***Solved, replaced with cited screenshots. -- [[User:Q|Q]] 21:35, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. Detailed, informative and worked on by lots of archivist. It think atleast 95 percent of what we know about the transporter is there. -- [[User:Q|Q]] 21:02, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. Yeah, plenty of information, and the transporter accident section is very informative. Its length is only to encompass the huge amount of information on this device. Good going, to anyone who helped out updating it! [[{{ns:user}}:Zsingaya|<span style="color:#00FF00;">Zsingaya</span>]] <sup> [[User talk:Zsingaya|''Talk'']]</sup> 16:09, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Support.''' Very informative is an understatement. :) --[[User:Galaxy001|Galaxy001]] 03:03, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
:*'''Featured'''. It's been over 2 weeks now with no objections. --[[User:Shran|From Andoria with Love]] 15:50, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
==Nominations with objections==
==Nominations with objections==

Revision as of 15:51, 1 February 2006


Nominations without objections

Nominations with objections

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.