(Nominations with objections: Archived Romulan history, <10 days, no consensus.)
Line 10: Line 10:
==Nominations with objections==
==Nominations with objections==
===[[Romulan history]]===
A really good read! I think it fits all the criteria for featured status. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] 16:59, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
:'''Comment''' -- it seems to me that it could use some 'see also' bits to other history articles perhaps. -- [[User:Sulfur|Sulfur]] 17:16, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
::'''Comment''' -- I didn't peer review the article, because I'm not willing and too busy to make much changes to it myself but I think it's a good candidate. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] 17:26, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
:'''Mild oppose'''. The article lacks some obvious links and I don't think the writing is up to par. The sections on the Awakening could be expanded, and there is no mention on the Underground/Re-unification movement during the 24th century. [[User:Logan 5|Logan 5]] 23:52, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
::'''Oppose'''. Agree completely with the above statements, especially regarding the re-unification movement. I also believe many of the points could be expanded with additional detail. -- [[User:Dmsdbo|Dmsdbo]] 23:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
::'''Oppose'''. The writing is very disjointed and does not flow well, particularly with the ancient history section. It also has an odd POV, with statements like "as yet unnamed" and "it is believed that", which are not the preferred style for in-universe articles. There is also speculation throughout the article, such as "presumably leading", or "later named" or "presumably under Romulan rule". It has typos such as "it's" instead of "its", and a couple of AD notations after years instead of before them (the latter of which I fixed). At least one semicolon is misused (first sentence, 24th Century), and plural possessives are noted as single possessive (neighbor's instead of neighbors'). All in all, it needs a good editorial scrub in my opinion. [[User:Aholland|Aholland]] 04:15, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:41, June 2, 2006


Nominations without objections

Julian Bashir, Secret Agent

Several people, including Defiant, Vedek Dukat, Weyoun and Excelsior, have done a good job on the page. Informative and well written. -- Tough Little Ship 22:30, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Support - Article is well written and covers the topic throughly--AndreMcKay 22:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Comment I could go either way on this one but before I vote I think that it could use a few more pics, and some editing. The paragraph that mentions Miles playing Felix, emphasizing "- yet again", doesn't work because there is no previous mention of his playing Felix. The emphasis doesn't have a precedent. I also think the article could relate the info in a fashion that doesn't emphasize one episode reference after another. Logan 5 23:58, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Nominations with objections

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.