m (archiving)
Line 2: Line 2:
==Nominations without objections==
==Nominations without objections==
===[[Thomas Riker]]===
*I '''nominate''' Thomas Riker. The article holds a good quality in its structure. and also contains the canon information about this character. We can't ask to much of this article, as he is only a side-character that appeared in two episodes. --[[User: Rom Ulan|<span style="background:darkgreen;color:white">Rom Ulan</span>]]<sup>[[user talk: Rom Ulan|<font color="#0000FF">Hail</font>]]</sup> 22:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. Thanks for nominating this again - I nominated some time ago and didn't get much support. It is now an even better article. -[[User:Rhinecanthus rectangulus|Rhinecanthus rectangulus]] 16:32, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
*<s>'''Marginal support'''</s>. It is a nice article, but nothing really jumps out at me to say it is a great article rather than just a good one.
: *'''Comments:''' In the infobox, it says he was "created" in 2361. This assumes he is the duplicate and not Will. I think they have equally valid claims to be the "real" Riker.
: *I don't like how his backstory is glossed over, saying it is the same is Will's. OTOH, I can't see duplicating Will's info here. A third option, having one page for the backstory, and then two more pages, one for William T. and one for Thomas, doesn't feel right either.
: *I'd like to see info from [[Sole Asylum, Part One]] and [[Sole Asylum, Part Two|Two]] incorporated into the apocrypha.
: *I'd rather see a DS9-era pic of him in the infobox than a TNG one. The different way he wears his beard distinguishes him from Will better. -- [[User:Connor Cabal|Connor Cabal]] 20:32, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
**I have changed it in to Transporter Duplicate & Duplication accident.
**It is hard to tell his early history. A page which would list his early life before the accident was deleted not long after it was created, the idea was not liked. And as you say, It does not look good if we have to identical sections about the early life for both him and the "real" one.
**I have not the possibility to read and add the information from those two books (i think it is books).
**I have added a DS9-pic of him, and changed the sidebar so it now looks like it does for other characters that have appeared with a gap between the first and last. It now has a picture from his "earliest" and one from his "latest" apperance.--[[User: Rom Ulan | Rom Ulan]] 21:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
* Commment: The two Sole Asylum "books" are comics. I have them both, and if I have the chance tonight, I'll doodle up a) summaries for the articles themselves, and b) doodle up some apocrypha for Tom's page. -- [[User:Sulfur|Sulfur]] 21:28, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
* Further comment: I've written summaries for the Riker story in each of those comics. If you're interested, see the links above. I also put in some notes at the end of the Apoc section. Oh, and I formatted the entire section because it was ghastly. -- [[User:Sulfur|Sulfur]] 17:38, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
**Great, how about a vote now ;-) ?´--[[User: Rom Ulan | Rom Ulan]] 15:35, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. Looks good. As soon as Rom's €500 arrives in my PayPal, we're good to go. ;-) --
[[User:Connor Cabal|Connor Cabal]] 02:28, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. For the love of all that is holy, make this a featured page! My goodness, it was good enough the last time it was nominated, back before HDTV, already. --[[User:GNDN|GNDN]] 21:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
*'''Comment'''. Please, one more support and it is elected.:-D--[[User: Rom Ulan | Rom Ulan]] 21:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
*'''Support''' I don't see anything in my opinion that makes this unsuitable. Great article. --[[User:Nmajmani|Nmajmani]] 02:05, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
==Nominations with objections==
==Nominations with objections==

Revision as of 14:21, 25 December 2007


Nominations without objections

Nominations with objections

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.