Line 3: Line 3:
==Nominations with objections==
==Nominations with objections==
===[[United Federation of Planets]]===
This is a re-nomination. I thought I'd wait at least two months to do this, but the peer review seems to be over. Both I and other contributors have made useful additions, to the point where an admin finally removed the peer review notice. I think this is as good as it is going to get. So, that said...
I hereby nominate this article for Featured Article status. I believe it to be clear, concise, well-structured and containing all available information on the subject. What say ye all?&ndash; [[User:Eyes Only|''Watching...'']]<sup>[[User Talk:Eyes Only|<span style="color:#00FF00;"> ''listening...''</span>]]</sup> 12:29, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
:It's getting there. I think adding some perspectives of other governments on the Federation would be a good add. Such as, I added the thing about the Breen attacking Earth, that was a big slap in the Federation's face. Also, Weyoun mentioned something about attacking Earth as the way to defeat the Federation (that I think might apply), then there was the comment in {{e|To the Death}} or {{e|The Ship}} about the Dominion outlasting the Federation, or [[Ru'afo]]'s comment about the "mighty Federation" 'reeking of death' (or something) because they had been challenged by all major powers in the quadrant. Kind of get that 'fair and balanced' thing going for the article. --[[User:Gvsualan|Alan]]
::'''OBJECT''': I am objecting based on the time between the two nominations. The last nomination was shut down due to heavy editing and the instability of the article. It was agreed upon that a few months should go by to make sure that the article was not being editing repeatedly with information cut in and cut out over and over again. I think that since just over two weeks has past between the nomination this is not enough time to determine this. I recommend the two month waiting period before considering another round of FA status. -[[User:FleetCaptain|FC]] 21:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
I would agree, if the peer review had not been removed by an anministrator. I took that as a sign that all was well and ready. Was I wrong?&ndash; [[User:Eyes Only|''Watching...'']]<sup>[[User Talk:Eyes Only|<span style="color:#00FF00;"> ''listening...''</span>]]</sup> 21:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
:::For what it's worth, the peer review template has been removed from the article, because it doesn't belong there in the first place. It still can be seen on the talk page, and the listing on RC still shows it as an active peer review. -- [[User:Cid Highwind|Cid Highwind]] 22:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:48, 11 March 2008


Nominations without objections

Nominations with objections

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.