Line 2: Line 2:
==Nominations without objections==
==Nominations without objections==
===[[Endgame (episode)]]===
I would like to suggest that this article be put up for nomination as it has a detailed summary, lots of quotes and a relevant background information. There doesn't seem to be much more that can be added to it. [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] 17:34, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
*'''SUPPORT (Provisionally)''': There are three red links in the co-star section. I think the main body of the article and the sub-sections should all link to existing articles (note that this does not include the references section at the very bottom which also has several red links). I support this so long as those three red links are turned towards existing articles, even just stubs. -[[User:FleetCaptain|FC]] 22:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''SUPPORT'''. It is refreshing to have a Featured Article nomination that isn't a self-nomination. I have been watching this article for over a year since I made a comment on the talk page and it has come a long way in that time. I have fixed the links as Fleet Captain suggested. Definitely deserving article! – [[User:Topher208|Topher]] 02:21, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''SUPPORT''' I wrote the summary. I'm very glad it meets with such approval. I thank those who have contributed further to it. &ndash; [[User:Eyes Only|''Watching...'']]<sup>[[User Talk:Eyes Only|<span style="color:#00FF00;"> ''listening...''</span>]]</sup> 02:05, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''WHY ARE WE ALL SHOUTING!''' :-p. '''Support'''. Nice summary, nicely illustrated, nice quotes, detailed background info with citations. In regards to red links, I don't think that the existence of these in an article should be a bar to being FA. Unless it's a link that needs fixing (admittedly like one here) or is inappropriate, it reflects absolutely nothing on the quality of the article itself. On the contrary, if the article becomes an FA hopefully more people will see the red links and fill in the gaps.&ndash; [[User:Cleanse|Cleanse]] 02:27, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
* Come on guys, only one more support required to feature. I'd hate for this to lapse with 4 votes.&ndash; [[User:Cleanse|Cleanse]] 10:23, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
: Yeah, it only needs one more vote. Please support this article! Thanks. [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] 10:49, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support.''' I fixed a small bit of formatting (removed an extra set of parentheses). Other than that, it is a great article. ----[[User:Mainphramephreak|<span style="color:#00FFFF;"> '''Willie'''</span>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Mainphramephreak|<span style="color:#FF7000;"> '''LLAP'''</span>]]</sup> 12:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
==Nominations with objections==
==Nominations with objections==

Revision as of 18:58, 11 June 2008


Nominations without objections

Nominations with objections

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.