Line 1: Line 1:
==Nominations without objections==
==Nominations without objections==
=== Dark Frontier ===
I would like to nominate the article {{VOY|Dark Frontier}} as it is extremely detailed. The summary is well written and complete, there are a decent amount of quotes and the background section has some interesting points. An all round excellent article, in my opinion. [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] 18:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
*<s>'''Minor Oppose''' The captions for the pictures are not very encyclopedic. They are more humorous than they should be. Also, the Background Info section could use expanding. --[[User:Nmajmani|Nmajmani]] 13:40, 8 August 2008 (UTC)</s>
*<s>'''Comment''': While I agree that the background section could use some (slight) expansion, I disagree about the image captions. I don't think that they are humorous at all, and I think that they describe the subject matter well. So, find some more background stuff and you'll have my support. ----[[User:Mainphramephreak|<span style="color:#0066CC;"> '''Willie'''</span>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Mainphramephreak|<span style="color:#FF7000;"> '''LLAP'''</span>]]</sup> 15:00, 8 August 2008 (UTC)</s>
:'''Comment''': I have added a couple of background notes to the article. If anyone else can find any more interesting notes that would be great. -- [[User:TrekFan|TrekFan]] 19:07, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support''': After the expansion to the background, I give this a Support -[[User:Nmajmani|Nmajmani]] 16:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support''': Excellent article, very well written summary, well chosen images. Good stuff! &ndash; [[User:Bertaut|Bertaut]] <sup>[[User Talk:Bertaut|<span style="color:#FFFF00;">talk</span>]]</sup> 19:44, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support''': Very detailed, I usually worry that I put too much in my articles but this one has eased my concern! Great pics as well. [[User:Dvp7|Dave]] 15:10, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support''': Nice one. --[[User:36ophiuchi|36ophiuchi]] 16:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support''': My concern for my above comment was taken care of. ----[[User:Mainphramephreak|<span style="color:#0066CC;"> '''Willie'''</span>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Mainphramephreak|<span style="color:#FF7000;"> '''LLAP'''</span>]]</sup> 16:55, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support''' I know the guy who wrote the episode summary. He has moved on, but I'll tell him that this is up for FA status. he'll be pleased. :) On his behalf, I thank everybody who has made improvements to it. &ndash; [[User:Eyes Only|''Watching...'']]<sup>[[User Talk:Eyes Only|<span style="color:#00FF00;"> ''listening...''</span>]]</sup> 19:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
===[[Klingon history]]===
===[[Klingon history]]===

Revision as of 23:37, 14 August 2008


Nominations without objections

Klingon history

After I've addressed all issues mentioned in the article's peer review and further complemented it with additional illustrations, I deem it ready to be seriously considered as a featured article. --36ophiuchi 15:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Support: Very well detailed. As far as I can tell, it covers all Klingon history. -- TrekFan 15:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Support: Cracking article, very thorough and informative. – Bertaut talk 17:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Support: Detailed and comprehensive, and obviously a lot of hard work and research has gone into this. A great resource for anybody interested in Klingon history, and brilliantly navigates the patchwork and sometimes conflicting continuity established on-screen. I enjoyed reading this, it's nicely illustrated and I actually felt like I learnt some interesting history from it! Definitely deserves to be featured. -- Taduolus 18:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Support: Very good article. Excellent, in fact. However, I think it's missing a small part: remember when Jadzia is talking about the ancient dynasties to Sirella, maybe that part should be included, or the people should be in a "more references" section. Dave 18:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
The info you're referring to actually is already part of the article. Just look under "Early history". --36ophiuchi 18:52, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Oh yeah, I had read it. Sorry, I forget these little things. Thanks :) Dave 19:40, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
  • VIGOROUS SUPPORT I read this article and felt as if I were reading it in Britannica, World Book or some other well known encyclopedia. Tone, style, exactly right for an encyclopedic strictly informational piece. – Watching... listening... 19:15, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Nominations with objections

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.