Line 1: Line 1:
==Nominations without objections==
==Nominations without objections==
==Nominations with objections==
==Nominations with objections==
===James T. Kirk (alternate reality)===
;[[James T. Kirk (alternate reality)]]:
'''Self nomination''': I nominate this article after building it on [[Memory Alpha]] and [[Memory Beta]]. I see this article as well bit and fit to the terms of the Memory Alpha standards. [[User:Roger Murtaugh|Roger Murtaugh]] 06:28, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
:'''Strong oppose''' The article is a mess of tenses, has far too informal a tone, is nowhere near complete, and will not be stable in any sense for months, if that. I'm sorry, but it's nowhere near featured status at this time. -- [[User:DarkHorizon|Michael Warren]] | [[User talk:DarkHorizon|''Talk'']] 06:44, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
:'''Strong oppose'''. Full agreement here, it will take some time until articles from the new movie can be featured. I wouldn't expect that until the DVD/Blu-ray release of the movie, so proper screenshots can be added. --[[User:Jörg|Jörg]] 06:46, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
:'''Oppose''', for reasons stated above. --[[User:Shran|From Andoria with Love]] 06:48, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
:'''Oppose''': The article's obviously been worked on, but it's still rather small, considering that Kirk was the star of a film. There's no background section, the images seem off (especially not a very good lead image), and there's a lack of pertinent information from the sidebar and article. Also, the lack of a background section and messed up formatting (no categories, bad tenses, et cetera) are all added in its favor. It's way, way too soon (2.5 hrs) for a featured article from the film, but you have guts for trying. It's currently one of the more complete articles from the film and will only get better in the coming weeks.--[[User:Tim Thomason|Tim Thomason]] 06:52, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
:It's a good start, and by all means, please continue working on it - but as has already been stated, articles being "featured" should be complete, have undergone serious community editing, and should be ''stable''. All of this is obviously not the case here, so '''oppose''' for the moment. -- [[User:Cid Highwind|Cid Highwind]] 12:15, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:14, 16 May 2009


Nominations without objections

Nominations with objections

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.