Nominations without objections

Sovereign class

I would like to nominate this article for FA status, as I believe it is a fully comprehensive article, covering all aspects of the Sovereign class design. I do not believe anything more can be added to this article. -- TrekFan Talk 23:19, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Nominations with objections


I find it to be a precise, well-written and thought-out, clear informational article about the character. I therefore hereby submit it for Featured Article status. – Crimsondawn hears you... 21:55, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

  • SUPPORT!!! Not to toot my own horn, but I've gone over it and cleaned up some glaring (and not so glaring) grammatical and syntax errors so I am seconding this article for nomination (can I do that?) -Italianajt 19:43, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
    • Indeed you can. In fact, this needs 5 supports in the minimum time in order to pass. --OuroborosCobra talk 20:39, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

*Oppose: The "clothing" list in the background information section is incomplete! This should either be removed or completed, preferably before featured article status is granted. --Defiant 21:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

  • Well, looks like there are half the episodes from season 1 and 3 of season 3 missing (including naked T'Pol in Harbinger!). I can certainly work on those these next few days. But if everyone wants to remove the list (I vote keep it actually) I won't bother lol DhaliaUnsung 03:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
    The clothing list is all finished! -- DhaliaUnsung 14:51, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Oppose - both myself and DhaliaUnsung have agreed that the "clothing" list could be improved if it listed how often T'Pol wore each outfit. As it is, the point of this section is completely lost on me, although it has (currently unrealized) potential. --Defiant 17:45, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
  • I support this nomination. The T'Pol article has been very helpful to me in the past, when researching the character for various endeavors. I find it organized, and very informative. -- Remember The Girl 22:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment - other than my clothing nitpick (see above), I find this article to have a repetitive sentence structure! Even though others might disagree with me and it is largely a very informative article, I feel this repeated structure draws me out of the article's meaning as the repetition is so prevalent. Although I've tried to introduce more variety of the sentence structures in this article, I still feel it could use a lot of work and would be willing to support the page if it didn't have so much of this repetition, as my clothing nitpick is just that - a trivial nitpick. I'm not sure what you call the type of sentence structure that this article uses time and again but this particular sentence (yes, the one you're reading right now!) is not an example of it whereas each of the previous sentences, in this comment of mine, are and it relates to how the sentence begins. --Defiant 11:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

The Doctor

This is a fantastic article, all the information is sorted into good sections. This has been well researched and should, in my opinion, be a featured article. DaveSubspace Message 09:45, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Support: An excellent and thorough article for an excellent character. The only thing I would change is "War Crimes" to something like "Accused War Crimes" since it is established that he (and Voyager) in fact committed none. DKqwerty 02:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Support: An excellent article. Very informative. -- TrekFan Talk 21:39, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Support: Though I would rather remove the photos of Kes and Janeway in the "relationships" section and add in photos of Denara Pel, his holo-family, etc. We know what K&J look like. Other than that, this is a fantastically well written and supported article that covers the many aspect of one of my favorite characters. -- DhaliaUnsung 22:00, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Oppose: IMHO, this article is not particularly well-written! Its use of punctuation is often incorrect (such as repeated inclusion of too many commas) and it has too many duplicated links (one example of which is to the Kes article). The major block paragraph about Seven of Nine should also be divided into smaller paragraphs, for easier readability. In addition, I agree with the comment above - that more useful images could be used in the "Relationships" section. And is it "the Doctor" or "The Doctor"? The article uses both! I think one method of these should definitively be settled upon (probably the same as is used in script sources), unless both are used in episode scripts (in which case, this information can be added to the "Background Information" section). Each of my criticisms above are minor nitpicks, however, and should be fairly easy to reconcile. I do, however, believe it is notable that two users have now commented on the use of images and how they may be improved. --Defiant 11:10, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
I've researched the naming tradition and all the scripts I could find refer to him as "the Doctor" except, of course, when written as the first words of a sentence. I've therefore changed the references in the article to fit this method. I've also tried to improve the use of punctuation and attempted to correct obvious grammatical errors, but the page still includes many examples of these as well as quite a few rambling sentences, strung together with "and"s! These would require someone more in-the-know about the fine details of grammatical structure (as well as a better knowledge of Voyager episodes) than I. --Defiant 13:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
I gave it a once over, but I'm sure it could use another. -- DhaliaUnsung 15:53, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
SupportBllasae 15:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Support. - Bell'Orso 14:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.