Nominations without objections

Broken Bow

  • I was also admazed that this wasn't a featured article. It's long complete, formatted, and well written. Tobyk777 00:17, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • Neutral. As well as the article is written, I feel that there are too many superfluous images in the summary.--Scimitar 13:12, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. Should be a featured article without question. - GusF 19:29, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)

A Matter of Perspective

  • Self nomination. This was one of my favourite all time TNG episodes. I feel that I've been exhaustive with writing this article without rambling on. I've written up most of the unwritten references as well to supplement the article.--Scimitar 12:30, 1 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Everything seems to be in order. Tobyk777 22:45, 1 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • Support It's a very well written summary. Tough Little Ship 23:00, 1 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak Support For starters, the main table wasn't formatted, and some spelling errors and needless pic sizing. But I cleaned alot of it up, and I think it's better. Something about it is still bothering me though... - AJHalliwell 21:45, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)


  • Self nomination (mostly). I think I've researched and added to this article as much as can be possibly added. I think it is well organized and well represented with appropriate images and background information. --Alan del Beccio 04:25, 30 Jul 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. Great work Gv`, as always. I particularly like the now-included rooms, although I wish the series kept a little continuity with bridges. - AJHalliwell 08:48, 30 Jul 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. This is a areally nicely written article. To me it's comparable to those on the best-written Federation starship classes. One little comment though. Was "Tin Man" the first episode where the name "D'deridex" was first quoted (by Data)? That could be of some use in the background information.--Scimitar 10:16, 30 Jul 2005 (UTC)
  • Support, very nice. Jaf 17:02, 31 Jul 2005 (UTC)Jaf
  • Support I just fixed the list of appearnces. Now everything about this article seems acurate, detalied, and comeplete. Tobyk777 05:34, 1 Aug 2005 (UTC)
    • There was nothing wrong with the list of appearance. They are supposed to be listed in order of appearance. --Alan del Beccio 05:42, 1 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. Alex Peckover 18:18, 5 Aug 2005 (UTC)


  • For a one-time, character, this is remarkably well-written and descriptive in my opinion.--T smitts 21:43, 5 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Nominations with objections

Orbital weapon platform

  • A well written article with good pictures. Tough Little Ship 13:35, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose. It's a good article, no doubt, but far from what a featured article should be: the best of the best, an example of MA's community work... It's a good article, but the subject simply isn't featured on the show enough for it to be a candidate for a FA. Ottens 17:45, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • Mild oppose I agree with ottens. Also, it seems that second pic with the Miranda-class being destroyed is kinda redundant, where a pic of the asteroid power source would be useful. Like Image:First Battle of Chin\'toka 3.jpg, or that before it exploded. - AJHalliwell 21:49, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • Surely the amount of appearances should not affect anything? We have featured articles of one time characters like Telek R'Mor and Grathon Tolar.
It should be noted that those are among, or are themselves, the shortest featured articles. Also, those two are very well written out, going into details more then the O.W.P. does in my opinion. - AJHalliwell 22:29, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose This article may be complete, but is not long enough for featured status. Tobyk777 03:20, 3 Aug 2005 (UTC)
    • It should be noted that quantity is not necessarily a requirement as much as quality is. --Alan del Beccio 05:07, 3 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose, although I made a few additions and corrections to it, I don't see that there is, or could possibly be, enough information to make it a well rounded article. It is what it is -- a complete article, I don't really see it as being anything more. --Alan del Beccio 18:48, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Jean-Luc Picard

  • I was admazed that this wasn't a featured article. It's long, comeplete, detalied, and is about one of the most popular figures in Trek. Tobyk777 00:15, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. I was considering nominating this article a while ago too but it was far from complete. Things have certainly changed since then.--Scimitar 13:12, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Although I composed/wrote much of the article, I still feel a considerable ammount of information is lacking before it should be featured: information on interest in Shakespearian theatre and classical music; relationship with Deanna Troi; information on relationships (possibly under "Romance") with Lily Sloane, Jenice Manheim, Miranda Vigo, Anij, possibly also the Borg Queen; information from "Star Trek: Generations". Ottens 17:40, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Force of Nature

  • I don't mean to be nominating too many articles at once, but this episode summary looks like its worth being featured. Tobyk777 00:24, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)
    • This was just nominated, failed and was archived less than 10 days ago and there have been no significant changes made to the page since then. (See:Deletion archive. --Alan del Beccio 04:56, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Beta 5 computer

  • Self-Nomination(First One) I didn't know if I should nominate this, because it was short but then I saw the Ethan Novakovich and that one is about the same length, or maybe slightly shorter. Anyway I am very proud what I wrote for this article was originally 2 sentences with not even a picture. I dont know how this will be recieved I just knwo I am proud of this article and I feel that it is very, very complete. WEll anyway here goes nothing if its not Featured material, then i wont nominate it ever again so. Here goes nothing.--Kahless 23:29, 30 Jul 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Don't get me wrong, the article's nicely written but I don't feel that it's one of those articles where the author(s) have gone well out of their way to write it - not only in terms of detail but adding background information (where appropriate) and just those other bits and pieces. --Scimitar 16:59, 31 Jul 2005 (UTC)
What can really be added it had only one appearance?--Kahless 03:21, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Reginald Barclay

  • Nominating because I believe that this article is complete, well written, and a great example of our work as a community. It works very well as a recurring character page. Mask 07:19, 27 Jul 2005 (UTC)

'Oppose- Its missing many minor things such as, the that Barclay de-evolved into a spider, the entire time he was affected by the alien probe, and hooked himself in teh the Enterprises computer, the fact that he does not play chess, but after the incident found a new incite for it. Also i believe on teh bottem that Barcloy doesn't stutter, they say he stammers? These are a few things that if taken care of I would change my vote. If not taken care of I'll try to see if i can fix. -Kahless 07:48, 27 Jul 2005 (UTC)

  • Oppose. Incomplete, such as mentioned above. Also, is Barclay earning of dividing sections? Not that this obviously has any requirement for featured, but I always think a page looks better with them. - AJHalliwell 08:21, 27 Jul 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose The refrences are messed up on the article Tobyk777 05:50, 29 Jul 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. Reginald Barclay is one of TNG and VOY's key recurring characters and should be a featured article. - GusF 19:26, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
    • Ya know, it seems to me, that all to often people nominate pages that "should be featured". Not like, really great articles like Grathon Tolar, United, or Search for the Xindi superweapon, but articles that should have so much information, you would expect them to be featured if they were complete. (like Jean-Luc Picard, Worf, and Data) People should remember to vote on if the page has covered all the information, it's creative, etc. and not because "they're a main character", or "they're a great, and funny character!" - AJHalliwell 18:44, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.