Nominations without objections

  • Dukat- Well written, documented, and extensive. One of the best character profiles I've seen. I added a whole lot and I think it looks great. Ryan123450 12:04, Aug 11, 2004 (CEST)
    • Seconded. -- Redge | Talk 19:11, 11 Aug 2004 (CEST)
    • Minor oppose. Needs a little cleanup with reference to.. well, references. Style should be adhered to (quotation marks), no need to repeat DS9 constantly, and any that occur in the main article should be removed from the separate section on Appearances. Would support once that is done. Support. -- Michael Warren | Talk 19:37, Aug 11, 2004 (CEST)
  • All Good Things... is, I think, one of the best episode summaries I've seen on MA to date. Ottens wrote most of it. I made some modifications, and I think it is now ready (maybe needs a link/spelling/gramar check, but that's all) -- Redge 21:24, 29 Jul 2004 (CEST)
  • Excelsior class Lots of people have contributed to this article, to make sure everything was indeed canon, and I believe that all we know about the Excelsior class has been included now. Ottens 12:43, 12 Aug 2004 (CEST)

Nominations with objections

  • Borg. It's not complete yet, but it already has so much so well organised information I feel it would already make a good featured article. -- Redge 20:46, 28 Jul 2004 (CEST)
    • This would make a good featured article, but I think we still need a lot of information there on the Borg in the Delta Quadrant, prior to Endgame. Opposed, for now... Ottens 10:45, 5 Aug 2004 (CEST)
      • You're right. Let's keep this listing for another day, than archive it. -- Redge | Talk 19:12, 11 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • Michael Eddington - Well organised, well written and contributed to by a few different people. Alex Peckover 08:47, Aug 5, 2004 (CEST)
    • I helped write a large chunk of this one, and I agree. Ryan123450 12:04, Aug 11, 2004 (CEST)
    • Oppose (for now). I find the article clear and conscise. Maybe a bit to conscise. I feel there should be more info added about what we learned in "For the Uniform". -- Redge | Talk 19:11, 11 Aug 2004 (CEST)
    • Oppose. Needs more detail. -- Michael Warren | Talk 19:44, Aug 11, 2004 (CEST)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.