Nominations without objections
Nominations with objections
A really good read! I think it fits all the criteria for featured status. --Defiant 16:59, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment -- it seems to me that it could use some 'see also' bits to other history articles perhaps. -- Sulfur 17:16, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment -- I didn't peer review the article, because I'm not willing and too busy to make much changes to it myself but I think it's a good candidate. --Defiant 17:26, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Mild oppose. The article lacks some obvious links and I don't think the writing is up to par. The sections on the Awakening could be expanded, and there is no mention on the Underground/Re-unification movement during the 24th century. Logan 5 23:52, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Agree completely with the above statements, especially regarding the re-unification movement. I also believe many of the points could be expanded with additional detail. -- Dmsdbo 23:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.