Nominations without objections

Eugenics Wars

I was amazed by this article! An unbelievably extensive resource regarding a subject not often touched upon in Trek; I was expecting a small page, possibly even a stub, but was extremely pleased to find all the information here, well written and presented. I'm quite impressed! (Obviously, it's not a self-nomination and I had no hand in creating this awesome page!) --Defiant 22:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Nominations with objections


This biography of the franchise's leading extra is suprisingly exhaustive and entertaining. It rivals the articles on James T. Kirk and Spock, which may not be inappropriate since the character appeared in the second TOS pilot, and remained throughout the series run. He has even been through death and life, just as his more illustrious crewmates have done. (I had nothing to do with this article, but it is interesting to note that the bulk of the work has been done by unnamed archivists identified only by IP numbers.)

  • Support. --GNDN 17:41, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Support. Kyle C. Haight 13:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose. There sure is a lot of good info here, and I want to see this as a FA, but as is, I suggest a peer review. There are a lot of one-sentence paragraphs that should be merged, as well as some other copyediting. Good suggestion GNDN, let's work on improving this article. -Humu­humu­nuku­nuku­āpuaʻa 16:19, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm new to this nomination business, but I do support -Humu­humu­nuku­nuku­āpuaʻa's suggestion regarding peer review. If we go this route, should the nomination be tabled (or de-listed)? In the alternative, could peer review be conducted concurrently? --GNDN 02:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Support as is. I love how he has relationships with other background characters. Cracks me up. Jaf 00:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Jaf
  • Support Very interesting article, lots of information. - Enzo Aquarius 15:45, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong support The length, breadth, and depth of this article are the definition of Memory Alpha at its best. It's so good, it makes other articles look bad by comparison. -- StAkAr Karnak 18:29, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Support. I'm amazed and impressed with such a thorough, serious approach to an extra. --Sasoriza 03:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Support as well. I thought the nomination policy had been revised a while back to include "consensus" votes so that one hold-out in the face of strong community support wouldn't hold up a nomination. I know I was the hold-out on a few occassions, and the one opposing the hold-out on some others. Logan 5 00:23, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Support. I'm really impressed that the initial work i did on this has been fleshed out so comprehensively. i felt crazy when i originally made a list of his 50+ appearances with uniform notes, this is greatly improved, and it was a group effort involving reg. users and anons alike. -- Captain M.K.B. 09:21, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Support. It's quite well constructed for a minor character in Star Trek TOS. --Sheliakcorp talk 18:45, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.