Nominations without objections

  • Telek R'Mor: an article I made a modest effort in making what it is today. --Gvsualan 01:08, 13 Feb 2005 (GMT)
  • Babel One. A large summary with pictures and section headings. Opposed previously, due to pictures that needed watermarks removing, although this has now been done. -- Defiant
Support It is hard to believe that an article could come so far so fast. Also, Defiant deserves an award. -- Ŭalabio 02:46, 2005 Feb 6 (CET)
We give out awards these days? ;-) Anyway, the article is a most detailed description of the episode, with enough pictures, well-done background information. I see no reason why it shouldn't be featured. Keep on writing, Defiant! Ottens 11:08, 6 Feb 2005 (CET)
Supported - A very nice summary, excellent work. -- Balok 21:00, 7 Feb 2005 (CET)
  • Galaxy class. I don't see why it shouldn't be featured again... Ottens 19:46, 3 Feb 2005 (CET)
Do articles that achieve featured status go into a rotation, and "float" to the home page periodically? Or must they be renominated to appear again? -- Balok 21:00, 7 Feb 2005 (CET)
Due to changes made to the Galaxy class article, its featured status was removed. Now, I'm renominating it... Ottens 22:00, 8 Feb 2005 (CET)
Supported -- Balok 22:55, 8 Feb 2005 (CET)
  • Emissary. Extensive and well sorted information on the Emissary of the Prophets. Good work. --BlueMars 18:21, Dec 24, 2004 (CET)
Supported. --Gvsualan 01:08, 13 Feb 2005 (GMT)

Nominations with objections

  • Leonard H. McCoy -- Very well written with many source references with no glaring or obvious omissions; good use of image inclusion. Appreciative apocrypha inclusion with appropriate formatting. | THOR 19:21, 8 Feb 2005 (CET)
Unfortunately I disagree at the moment. For one I believe an article needs to be 95-100% complete before it is nominated and, for certain, featured. This, in my opinion is maybe only at 80%. I have contributed an immense amount of material to the article and it is still not completed to what I think is required for McCoy. I've "hidden" (ie. <!--- --->) a number of things in the edit portion of the article that I still wish to see in the article, just haven't had the time or DVD sources to add it. But, in short, there is virtually ZERO movie data in the article, just generic summaries, definately not enough to call it "complete". --Gvsualan 19:50, 8 Feb 2005 (CET)
Very well written, but agree with Gvsualan. Needs to be all-complete before being featured... Ottens 23:42, 12 Feb 2005 (GMT)
  • Kes: Well I wrote most of it so I like it (thanks to those others who tidied and added things). LordJuss 14:20, 21 Jan 2005 (CET)
    • Opposed for now. Certainly not bad, however lacking some personal information like her relationships to Neelix and Tom Paris. --BlueMars 19:47, Jan 23, 2005 (CET)
  • Mission to Horatius. I think that this is a good article that is growing. Luke80.
    • I disagree. The article at least needs a cover image, a better "plot summary" and needs to be wikified (including links). Additionally, there still seem to be some errors (NGC 400 vs. 434, for example) -- Cid Highwind 11:21, 2004 Dec 31 (CET)
    • Agreed with Cid. Objected, for now. Ottens 14:37, 16 Jan 2005 (CET)
  • Equinox, Part I and Equinox, Part II. Self-nomination, just added all details to this episode which I can think of. A few dead links at the moment, but I'm working on them -- MiChaos 19:09, 7 Nov 2004 (CET).
    • Supported, but like Parallels, needs some pictures... Of course, thats not a reason to seriously object, but a suggestion. Ottens 19:20, 8 Nov 2004 (CET)

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.