Nominations without objections


After this article was peer reviewed for quite some time, I would like to nominate it for FA status. --36ophiuchi 17:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

  • Support: Very detailed article. Lots of information and appropriate images compliment the text. TrekFan 19:52, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. Well-researched and complete. --31dot 21:33, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Support - extremely well-written and comprehensive. Both the History and Background sections are fantastic and informative.– Cleanse 00:03, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Support - I did a lot of the ground work on this article, building up the written sections, defining the structure and adding many of the images. But it has been modified, corrected and improved by a number of people since I had my way with it, and I think it's now well-written and researched, brilliantly comprehensive and a great informative article. A heck of a lot of loving hard work by the community has gone into this article, and I'm grateful to everyone who's improved it, nominated it and supported it for FA. Support, support, support from me! - Taduolus 12:24, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Support: Very well written, nice small chunks of text littered with pictures - well done to everyone who has worked on this article! And wow, this has had five votes in just five days! Dave 18:11, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. Definitly well written and I don't miss anything. Good work. – Tom 18:37, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Dark Frontier

I would like to nominate the article VOY: "Dark Frontier" as it is extremely detailed. The summary is well written and complete, there are a decent amount of quotes and the background section has some interesting points. An all round excellent article, in my opinion. TrekFan 18:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Nominations with objections

Jonathan Archer

Having just read this article, I think that it is very detailed, there are plenty of pictures to break up the text, everything looks really good. As one of the "main captains", it has to be detailed, and this has been done very well. Dave 01:44, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Support. I was just reading this article and thought the same thing. Very well written article. TrekFan 01:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Conditional Support. Just want to know what still needs to be cited in the article- once that it resolved, I support this being a FA.--31dot 23:19, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. I agree with those before me that this is a well written article and worthy of FA status – Melak 05:26, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment: Anyone else want to vote? Dave 07:44, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. I like this article and also the bunch of information in it. For the few "incite" pna's: Should be expanded. And maybe a gallery of his love interests would look good (?). But I think it should be a featured one. – Tom 09:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment Well, I've done a quick once over (and found some odd grammar I corrected) and it looks pretty good, but the pictures IMO need to be changed. WAY too many "reaction" shots, in my opinion, the scourge of an encyclopedia like this one. I want to see him doing the stuff they talk about, not looking at the ground with a stern face considering what he'll have to do. - AJ Halliwell 16:01, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Oppose - Well, the article's long I'll give it that. But looking more closely at it its not "complete" at all. The relationship section barely touches on Shran, Forrest and Porthos, not to mention the many love interests. There are still sections that require citation, and as I said before, some of the pictures could use replacing. - AJ Halliwell 16:22, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.