(Nominated NINE orphaned images!) |
(Noted deletions, removed some old entries.) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*** The wavery image could certainly be replaced if this is the general consensus. I put it there because I felt it better illustrated what Balok actually looked like in the episode. All images on the Balok page were capped; I've had 'smaller_balok' for so long I'm no longer sure where I got it -- might be the now (evidently) defunct Star Trek in Sound and Vision. My suggestion would be: leave this image along, and let folks who like it better discuss it at the Balok page. Whatever the consensus is after a week or so, we can implement. |
*** The wavery image could certainly be replaced if this is the general consensus. I put it there because I felt it better illustrated what Balok actually looked like in the episode. All images on the Balok page were capped; I've had 'smaller_balok' for so long I'm no longer sure where I got it -- might be the now (evidently) defunct Star Trek in Sound and Vision. My suggestion would be: leave this image along, and let folks who like it better discuss it at the Balok page. Whatever the consensus is after a week or so, we can implement. |
||
** We've already got three images of the various incarnations of Balok. Also, the "wavery" image actually serves a purpose, since the article's text describes that the original image of Balok on the viewscreen wavered as if caused by an exotic atmosphere in his control room. I support deletion of Smaller_balok.jpg. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 14:00, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST) |
** We've already got three images of the various incarnations of Balok. Also, the "wavery" image actually serves a purpose, since the article's text describes that the original image of Balok on the viewscreen wavered as if caused by an exotic atmosphere in his control room. I support deletion of Smaller_balok.jpg. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 14:00, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
* [[:Image:Lwaxana troi.jpg]] - there is a better one on [[:Image:Lwaxana Troi.jpg]] -- [[User:Florian K|Florian K]] 01:48, 21 Aug 2004 (CEST) |
* [[:Image:Lwaxana troi.jpg]] - there is a better one on [[:Image:Lwaxana Troi.jpg]] -- [[User:Florian K|Florian K]] 01:48, 21 Aug 2004 (CEST) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
**Agreed with Mike's suggestion. |
**Agreed with Mike's suggestion. |
||
** Agree with Mike, delete [[:Image:Lwaxana Troi.jpg]]. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 13:45, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST) |
** Agree with Mike, delete [[:Image:Lwaxana Troi.jpg]]. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 13:45, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
* [[:Image:Voyager Bridge.jpg]]. Identical to [[:Image:Voyager Bridge.jpg]]. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 16:52, 31 Aug 2004 (CEST) |
* [[:Image:Voyager Bridge.jpg]]. Identical to [[:Image:Voyager Bridge.jpg]]. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 16:52, 31 Aug 2004 (CEST) |
||
** Umm, Ottens? Those two links point to the same image! ;-) -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 13:45, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST) |
** Umm, Ottens? Those two links point to the same image! ;-) -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 13:45, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST) |
||
| − | |||
| − | * [[:Image:Voyager1.jpg]] -- non-canon image, someone's personal work. Not suitable for inclusion. -- [[User:DarkHorizon|Michael Warren]] | [[User talk:DarkHorizon|''Talk'']] 20:26, Sep 1, 2004 (CEST) |
||
| − | **Delete. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 20:48, 1 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
* [[:Image:Original Enterprise corridor.jpg]]. Unused and unnecessary. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 21:02, 1 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
* [[:Image:Original Enterprise corridor.jpg]]. Unused and unnecessary. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 21:02, 1 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | |||
| − | * [[:Image:Defiant project logo.png]]. Replaced by the higher quality [[:Image:Defiant Development Logo.jpg]]. Furthermore, the latter is a .JPG file, while the other is PNG, which is larger in size... [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 12:19, 5 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
||
** '''Deleted.''' -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 13:45, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST) |
** '''Deleted.''' -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 13:45, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST) |
||
* [[:Image:Sts107_crew_faces.jpg]]. Real-life images are not appropriate for Memory Alpha; the ''Columbia'' disaster is not considered part of the ''Star Trek'' universe. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 03:27, Sep 7, 2004 (CEST) |
* [[:Image:Sts107_crew_faces.jpg]]. Real-life images are not appropriate for Memory Alpha; the ''Columbia'' disaster is not considered part of the ''Star Trek'' universe. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 03:27, Sep 7, 2004 (CEST) |
||
| + | ** '''Deleted.''' -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 19:44, Sep 13, 2004 (CEST) |
||
* [[:Image:Shran2151.jpg]]. This image is a duplicate of [[:Image:Shran_proving_ground.jpg]], and of a lower quality and resolution. There's no need to keep both of these; I propose we keep the higher-quality picture and delete Shran2151.jpg. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 19:06, Sep 7, 2004 (CEST) |
* [[:Image:Shran2151.jpg]]. This image is a duplicate of [[:Image:Shran_proving_ground.jpg]], and of a lower quality and resolution. There's no need to keep both of these; I propose we keep the higher-quality picture and delete Shran2151.jpg. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 19:06, Sep 7, 2004 (CEST) |
||
| + | ** '''Deleted.''' -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 19:44, Sep 13, 2004 (CEST) |
||
* [[:Image:Constitutions formation.jpg]]. I unintentionally uploaded a duplicate of this image to [[:Image:Starfleet battle group.jpg]] the other day; however, I recommend deleting the first one because it's a grainier image of lower quality. I will move the more-detailed description to the new image page. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 13:45, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST) |
* [[:Image:Constitutions formation.jpg]]. I unintentionally uploaded a duplicate of this image to [[:Image:Starfleet battle group.jpg]] the other day; however, I recommend deleting the first one because it's a grainier image of lower quality. I will move the more-detailed description to the new image page. -- [[User:MinutiaeMan|Dan Carlson]] | [[User talk:MinutiaeMan|Talk]] 13:45, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST) |
||
Revision as of 17:44, 13 September 2004
Template:Ifd
Images suggested for deletion
- Image:Smaller_balok.jpg - image uploaded for user page in violation of the rules Balok 21:51, 17 Aug 2004 (CEST)
- Well, this is still a relevant Trek image, and i find it to be more illustrative that the "wavery" screencap on the Balok page. Perhaps we could keep this one incorporated into an article also, besides your user page. -- Captain Mike K. Bartel 17:30, 19 Aug 2004 (CEST)
- The wavery image could certainly be replaced if this is the general consensus. I put it there because I felt it better illustrated what Balok actually looked like in the episode. All images on the Balok page were capped; I've had 'smaller_balok' for so long I'm no longer sure where I got it -- might be the now (evidently) defunct Star Trek in Sound and Vision. My suggestion would be: leave this image along, and let folks who like it better discuss it at the Balok page. Whatever the consensus is after a week or so, we can implement.
- We've already got three images of the various incarnations of Balok. Also, the "wavery" image actually serves a purpose, since the article's text describes that the original image of Balok on the viewscreen wavered as if caused by an exotic atmosphere in his control room. I support deletion of Smaller_balok.jpg. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 14:00, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST)
- Deleted. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 19:44, Sep 13, 2004 (CEST)
- Well, this is still a relevant Trek image, and i find it to be more illustrative that the "wavery" screencap on the Balok page. Perhaps we could keep this one incorporated into an article also, besides your user page. -- Captain Mike K. Bartel 17:30, 19 Aug 2004 (CEST)
- Image:Lwaxana troi.jpg - there is a better one on Image:Lwaxana Troi.jpg -- Florian K 01:48, 21 Aug 2004 (CEST)
- Keep this image, and delete Image:Lwaxana Troi.jpg.. there's no reason for that image to be so large! Captain Mike K. Bartel 17:41, 22 Aug 2004 (CEST)
- Agreed with Mike's suggestion.
- Agree with Mike, delete Image:Lwaxana Troi.jpg. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 13:45, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST)
- Deleted Image:Lwaxana Troi.jpg. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 19:44, Sep 13, 2004 (CEST)
- Image:Voyager Bridge.jpg. Identical to Image:Voyager Bridge.jpg. Ottens 16:52, 31 Aug 2004 (CEST)
- Umm, Ottens? Those two links point to the same image! ;-) -- Dan Carlson | Talk 13:45, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST)
- Image:Original Enterprise corridor.jpg. Unused and unnecessary. Ottens 21:02, 1 Sep 2004 (CEST)
- Deleted. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 13:45, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST)
- Image:Sts107_crew_faces.jpg. Real-life images are not appropriate for Memory Alpha; the Columbia disaster is not considered part of the Star Trek universe. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 03:27, Sep 7, 2004 (CEST)
- Deleted. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 19:44, Sep 13, 2004 (CEST)
- Image:Shran2151.jpg. This image is a duplicate of Image:Shran_proving_ground.jpg, and of a lower quality and resolution. There's no need to keep both of these; I propose we keep the higher-quality picture and delete Shran2151.jpg. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 19:06, Sep 7, 2004 (CEST)
- Deleted. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 19:44, Sep 13, 2004 (CEST)
- Image:Constitutions formation.jpg. I unintentionally uploaded a duplicate of this image to Image:Starfleet battle group.jpg the other day; however, I recommend deleting the first one because it's a grainier image of lower quality. I will move the more-detailed description to the new image page. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 13:45, Sep 9, 2004 (CEST)
- Image:Ssbotanybay.jpg - extremely poor quality image, not suitable for display purposes. -- Michael Warren | Talk 21:35, Sep 10, 2004 (CEST)
- for now is better than nothing, and can at least be a placeholder, hardly worth being anal about. -- FuturamaGuy
- Delete. It may be a decent picture in general, but it's not focusing on the Botany Bay itself -- other images can and should do that better. Memory Alpha is not an image gallery, after all! -- Dan Carlson | Talk 02:07, Sep 11, 2004 (CEST)
September 13, 2004
- Image:Wedding.jpg: Orphaned image. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 19:41, Sep 13, 2004 (CEST)
- Image:TNG_A_Hard_Rain.jpg: Orphaned image. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 19:41, Sep 13, 2004 (CEST)
- Image:TMP 7.jpg: Orphaned image. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 19:41, Sep 13, 2004 (CEST)
- Image:Startrek_x-mencover.jpg: Orphaned image. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 19:41, Sep 13, 2004 (CEST)
- Image:Nimoy_old.jpg: Orphaned image. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 19:41, Sep 13, 2004 (CEST)
- Image:Nemesis5.jpg: Orphaned image. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 19:41, Sep 13, 2004 (CEST)
- Image:Excelsior_Bridge_3.jpg: Orphaned image. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 19:41, Sep 13, 2004 (CEST)
- Image:Equinox_MSD.jpg: Orphaned image. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 19:41, Sep 13, 2004 (CEST)
- Image:Betazed_surface.jpg: Orphaned image. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 19:41, Sep 13, 2004 (CEST)
