Memory Alpha:Pages for deletion/Antiproton injector

This is a page to discuss the suggestion to delete "Antiproton injector".

• If you are suggesting a page for deletion, add your initial rationale to the section "Deletion rationale".
• If you want to discuss this suggestion, add comments to the section "Discussion".
• If a consensus has been reached, an administrator will explain the final decision in the section "Admin resolution".

In all cases, please make sure to read and understand the deletion policy before editing this page.

Deletion rationale

Deletion was suggested on the talk page. -- Capricorn (talk) 00:27, February 3, 2017 (UTC)

Discussion

Delete. The article is non-canon and speculative. Chalet (talk) 14:48, February 7, 2017 (UTC)

• Delete. --LauraCC (talk) 21:18, February 16, 2017 (UTC)

Keep. As stated on the talk page of the article, the term is mentioned on an okudagram. If I understand this correctly. So the term is canon. The article should be rewritten but not deleted. Tom (talk) 08:11, March 12, 2017 (UTC)

I don't think the talk page makes that claim, or that it is on the graphic. The okudagram mentions an "antiproton injection subsystem" (for which we have a page). But the phrase "antiproton injector doesn't seem to appear. -- Capricorn (talk) 15:57, March 12, 2017 (UTC)

To cite the talk page, "The only infomation is antiproton injector and another item labeled antiproton is readable and there is no other infomation other than the name." Tom (talk) 16:14, March 12, 2017 (UTC)

Okay, sorry, I went with the later statement after Chalet did more research. And atmittedly it's a bit vague on the issue. But what's more important, this seems to be the one graphic with the terms - judge for yourself. -- Capricorn (talk) 17:43, March 12, 2017 (UTC)

Admin resolution

Deleted. This specific term does not appear on the okudagram mentioned above. Tom (talk) 22:42, May 24, 2017 (UTC)