Archiving immediate deletions?[]
Outcome: Immediate deletion suggestions do not need to be archived to avoid cluttering this list. (Note added to page). -- Cid Highwind 13:03, 20 Jul 2005 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It's a good thing to archive deletion discussions in my opinion, but I don't think we need to archive immediate deletions. More often than not, those deal with "technical" issues (orphaned redirects, spelling errors, pure vandalism, etc.), not with any form of useful content. To avoid cluttering this list, I suggest to not archive immediate deletions any longer. What do you think? -- Cid Highwind 12:35, 10 Sep 2004 (CEST)
- I was thinking the same thing, but just was thurough. I'll get rid of them. -- Redge | Talk 18:16, 10 Sep 2004 (CEST)
- I agree, the immediate deletions are pretty much unnecessary. -- Dan Carlson | Talk 18:41, Sep 10, 2004 (CEST)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.