FANDOM


m
m (A question, probably already answered...)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
**The first part of what Alan said is the classic Wikipedian argument; that it's a free and open and cooperative and whatever encyclopedia effort. The second is also true, because I hardly see any vandalism here as much as just misunderstandings and whatnot. The way I see it, what's the point of making people register if the true vandals are just going to register bogus names anyway? --[[User:Broik|Broik]] 03:20, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 
**The first part of what Alan said is the classic Wikipedian argument; that it's a free and open and cooperative and whatever encyclopedia effort. The second is also true, because I hardly see any vandalism here as much as just misunderstandings and whatnot. The way I see it, what's the point of making people register if the true vandals are just going to register bogus names anyway? --[[User:Broik|Broik]] 03:20, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 
* For example: [[User:BajoranBadass]], [[User:BajoranBrouhaha]], [[User:BajoranBumpkin]], [[User:Lazarus the 1337]], [[User:Lazarus the Annihlator]], [[User:Lazarus the Destroyer]], [[User:Lazarus the Mighty]], among others-- which have been more or less confirmed to be the same user. --[[User:Gvsualan|Alan del Beccio]] 04:17, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 
* For example: [[User:BajoranBadass]], [[User:BajoranBrouhaha]], [[User:BajoranBumpkin]], [[User:Lazarus the 1337]], [[User:Lazarus the Annihlator]], [[User:Lazarus the Destroyer]], [[User:Lazarus the Mighty]], among others-- which have been more or less confirmed to be the same user. --[[User:Gvsualan|Alan del Beccio]] 04:17, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  +
  +
:True, true. What about moderation of unregistered user edits then? A reasonable stopgap but I bet there's a catch: (something like its not built yet?) I know I wanted to register to contribute meaningful content under a particular account, whereas I would bet a larger percent of the vandals wouldn't even bother to register. And I certainly see the appeal of anonymous contributions. --[[User:Funkdubious|Funkdubious]] 04:53, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
   
 
==Memory Alpha:Vandalism in progress needs restructing==
 
==Memory Alpha:Vandalism in progress needs restructing==

Revision as of 04:53, November 13, 2005

A question, probably already answered...

(but not in the FAQ) ;-)

Why not simply disallow non-registered members to edit pages? or, require non-registered users' changes to be moderated. --Funkdubious 03:12, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Because that would vastly decrease the number of casual editors who do not wish to join but wish to make minor contributions, if they, by chance stumble onto this site. Besides, the vandalism here isn't that bad considering the overall IP volume we receive that we have to make this a "members only" club. --Alan del Beccio 03:17, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
    • The first part of what Alan said is the classic Wikipedian argument; that it's a free and open and cooperative and whatever encyclopedia effort. The second is also true, because I hardly see any vandalism here as much as just misunderstandings and whatnot. The way I see it, what's the point of making people register if the true vandals are just going to register bogus names anyway? --Broik 03:20, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • For example: User:BajoranBadass, User:BajoranBrouhaha, User:BajoranBumpkin, User:Lazarus the 1337, User:Lazarus the Annihlator, User:Lazarus the Destroyer, User:Lazarus the Mighty, among others-- which have been more or less confirmed to be the same user. --Alan del Beccio 04:17, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
True, true. What about moderation of unregistered user edits then? A reasonable stopgap but I bet there's a catch: (something like its not built yet?) I know I wanted to register to contribute meaningful content under a particular account, whereas I would bet a larger percent of the vandals wouldn't even bother to register. And I certainly see the appeal of anonymous contributions. --Funkdubious 04:53, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Memory Alpha:Vandalism in progress needs restructing

Frankly, this page is a mess. We either need to clean it out completely periodically (like the sandbox) or split the page into two sections, "Current vandalism" and "Archived vandals"-- that can be used as a "watch list" for reference to "current vandalism" posters and admins. Thoughts? Comments? --Alan del Beccio 04:17, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.