This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1998 (production) article.
For general discussion, please visit Memory Alpha's Discussions, or join the chat on Discord.
Just curious, do we really need all of these '[Month][Year]' links? I notice that these are for wikis in a Starfleet Academy comic. Couldn't the wiki just link here like: [[1998 Productions|June 1998]]? - Adm. Enzo Aquarius 16:07, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's a good idea. I'll change it. --Tgkshorney 16:19, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- Well, i think it may one day be necessary to disambiguate each "YEAR productions" page into sub articles -- if the links are all changed to piped versions ([[1998 Productions|June 1998]]) -- then we'll need to change them all back when we do that -- which is why we shouldn't use piped links instead of redirects in some cases. -- Captain Mike K. Barteltalk
- So is it ok to have created these new 'month' pages?--Tgkshorney 16:31, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- That's how i've been doing it, based upon the above rationale -- Captain Mike K. Barteltalk 16:39, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- So is it ok to have created these new 'month' pages?--Tgkshorney 16:31, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- Well, i think it may one day be necessary to disambiguate each "YEAR productions" page into sub articles -- if the links are all changed to piped versions ([[1998 Productions|June 1998]]) -- then we'll need to change them all back when we do that -- which is why we shouldn't use piped links instead of redirects in some cases. -- Captain Mike K. Barteltalk