Donatu V[]
Donatu V happened "23 solar years ago" from the time "The Trouble with Tribbles" occurred; "Trials and Tribble-ations" established that "TTwT" occurred in 2268. Quick subtraction of 2268-23yrs means that the battle occurred closer to this year, than 2242 and 2244, which both previous contained this reference. --Alan del Beccio 06:53, 23 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Archer in Star Trek (2009)[]
Star Trek 2009 only states that it was an Admiral Archer, not that it was Jonathan Archer, given the information from "In the Mirror, Darkly" that said he became the Federation President at one point Scotty would have said President Archer's prize beagle (his most senior position) if he was talking about Jonathan Archer, right? (we say President Eisenhower, not General Eisenhower) Chasemarc (talk) 06:07, June 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Please don't discuss this in multiple locations; the Jonanthan Archer alt reality page is enough. 31dot (talk) 09:11, June 2, 2013 (UTC)
Commissioning date (background information)[]
- Although this clashes with a "twenty years old" reference in Star Trek III: The Search for Spock, which would indicate that the Enterprise only dated back to the early 2260s, the later date is supported by the fact that Pike served aboard her during the 2250s, and April much earlier, who served aboard prior to his ambassadorship, beginning in 2250, while under the assumption that he commanded a five-year mission.
Shouldn't that be the earlier date? (As in, 2245 is earlier than 2260)? Or is there another way to read this that I'm missing? If I'm misreading this, can it be rephrased to make it more clear?
134.134.139.74 07:23, December 25, 2019 (UTC)
Pike first officer date[]
Pike's personnel file mentions he was first officer under April, but does it really mentions he held that position as soon as 2245 ? - From Cardassia with pain (talk) 19:30, September 19, 2020 (UTC)