Featured Article Nomination (voting concluded)[]
Delta Flyer - Very thorough, with stats, images and text. --Dalen 11:16, 19 Mar 2005 (EST)
- Support Rebelstrike2005 08:31, 20 Mar 2005 (EST)
- Support Good article. Sole objection: I would recommend a better/higher quality image of the Delta Flyer. Ottens 08:35, 20 Mar 2005 (EST)
- Support — THOR 14:37, 23 Mar 2005 (EST)
- Support This is a very well done article, I wish there was a pic of it in battle. - 138.217.216.229 00:29, 13 March 2007 (UTC).
- Um, judging from the dates above, you've just supported an article that has been featured for 2 years, in fact, that is why it is on the Main Page. --Alan del Beccio 03:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support This is a good article, but I would have liked more on the physical layout of the interior, a diagram and description of the interior would be great, this info is probably in one of the reference books.
- *Points to above comment made by Alan* ;) - Enzo Aquarius 22:07, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- ""Support"" I know of some schematics on [1]this web site which has a good black on white image. – Ajedi 18:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Um, judging from the dates above, you've just supported an article that has been featured for 3 years, in fact, that is why it is on the Main Page. --Alan 19:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Speed[]
Anyone have information on the Flyer's top warp speed?
Pictures[]
Anyone have a picture of the Flyer on a planet surface? -7th Tacical
Removed[]
I have removed the following:
- The existence of the retractable warp nacelles has been stated on screen, and they were shown in VOY: "Good Shepherd" as the Delta Flyer dropped out of warp while heading to the site of survey mission.
It was after the first section of information that states the Flyer has retractable warp nacelles. This note doesn't say anything more about them other than they were featured in an episode, which is what the citations are there for anyway. -- TrekFan Talk 19:19, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Getting onboard the Delta Flyer[]
How did people get onboard the Delta Flyer?.A ramp or a door.I don't know how they got onboard the Delta Flyer.--67.165.88.232 19:54, 27 April 2009 (UTC]Answer me.--67.165.88.232 17:30, 28 April 2009 (UTC)Just tell me and i need to know this.--67.165.88.232 15:53, 29 April 2009 (UTC)tell me.--67.165.88.232 20:16, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe no one knows. You can keep asking, but if we never saw the door on the show, no one is going to answer you no matter how many times you bump this. --OuroborosCobra talk 20:45, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- What is the evidence for this assumption? --OuroborosCobra talk 09:34, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
speed in sidebar?[]
I was thinking that, since the Delta Flyer is known to be warp-capable (though the specific maximum warp factor is unknown), should we put "Speed: warp-capable" in the sidebar? We've done this for various other ships that are known to be warp-capable but not much more. I would have just put the modification in myself, but I hesitate to make changes to a featured article without checking around first. Mdettweiler 11:50, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Dimensions[]
Are there any sources stating how big the Delta Flyer is? Also, any stating the size of the shuttlebay door? I'm not certain if the Flyer fits through the door at its original dimensions.--Indefatigable 16:07, September 7, 2009 (UTC)
- As far as I know, no figures were stated in canon or by official production sources. However, there is a very good (but of course non-canon) analysis of the Delta Flyer's size based on visual evidence at Ex Astris Scientia. -Mdettweiler 16:59, September 7, 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the pointer. To coin a phrase, 'Fascinating'.--Indefatigable 02:33, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
- According to the Star Trek Magazine the Delta Flyer was supposed to be about 21 metres long and about 5 metres high.--A Pickering 18:08, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
Image red links[]
Two of the images in the sidebar, File:Delta Flyer interior.jpg and File:Delta Flyer aftcompartment.jpg, are showing up as red links right now. I was able to visit both of those images without a problem by entering their names in the search box, so clearly they still exist at those names. Is this another of those eternally annoying image caching problems that have been striking various places off and on? -Mdettweiler 07:17, February 16, 2010 (UTC)