Did the holoship actually possess a cloaking device or was it some other unknown means, such as holographic imagery that was used, like the non-canon, USS Incursion? Just wondering if it was ever stated to be a cloaking device. If not, then we should remove this from the article. -- TrekFan Talk 15:44, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Well the dialogue had two orders to decloak the ship and "Did the hostages mention a cloaked ship during their debriefing?", so I suppose we could change it to "cloaking ability" to be more vague about it. There was also the mention of neutrino emissions caused by the cloak, a reference I have always associated to the Star Trek VI klingon cloaking device's neutron radiation that was also detectable from close range. --Pseudohuman 19:04, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

The evidence does support a cloaking device then. Just checking. Thanks. I remember Picard saying decloak the ship but I couldn't remember a direct reference to a cloaking device, that's all. Thanks again. -- TrekFan Talk 20:56, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Aft? Edit

The main sidebar pic is captioned "Forward view." Are we sure about this? We never actually saw the ship flying in any one direction. If anything the red lights would seem to be impulse engines, indicating that it is an aft view. -Angry Future Romulan 16:53, April 24, 2012 (UTC)

Bussard collectors are also red though, and face forward. - Archduk3 17:24, April 24, 2012 (UTC)

Crap, you're right. -Angry Future Romulan 17:24, April 24, 2012 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.