FANDOM


Past and special-purpose discussions related to this article can be found on the following subpages:
Help icon
Intrepid class/archive

Memory Alpha talk pages are for improving the article only.
For general discussion on this subject, visit the forums at The Trek BBS.


FA status Edit

Nomination for featured articleEdit

Self-nomination. I included information about the class' history, its tactical and defensive systems, and the starship's interior design. I tried to include as many references as I could remember from the series. Ottens 19:05, 11 Jul 2004 (CEST)

  • Seconded. --BlueMars 01:02, Jul 14, 2004 (CEST)
  • Seconded. Though it does still need a lot of references, I'm sure these will be filled in later. Another great article! -- Redge 13:23, 22 Jul 2004 (CEST)
  • Archived --Alan del Beccio 07:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

FA removal (18 Mar - 29 Mar, 2007) Edit

Any article with 21 {{incite}}s shouldn't be a featured article. It was originally marked as a featured article on July 24, 2004 by user Redge, apparently without a nomination or discussion, and has changed significantly since then. -- Renegade54 16:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Support removal. Not sure about whether it really was nominated or not (the 2004 archive is highly unreliable), but the incite markers are more than enough. -- Cid Highwind 18:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Support removal. Yikes, 21 citation failures?! — THOR =/\= 20:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Redge was notorious for doing that, based on my investigations on other questionable and old featured articles. However, in this case, I did find the votes for this nomination and had them archived here for posterity, where interestingly he noted: "Though it does still need a lot of references, I'm sure these will be filled in later." Until we can get things cited, I vote to remove it as well. --Alan del Beccio 04:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Support, with the suggestion of citing stuff and putting through a peer review as quickly as possibly to get this featured again. --OuroborosCobra talk 05:01, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Comment: From what I see, it appears many of the uncited references may be based on observational references. We currently have no way to cite such references, unless we simply cite the first episode that particular observation was made in. --Alan del Beccio 05:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
That would seem to be a pretty good solution right there... --OuroborosCobra talk 05:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Support removal of FA status, would like to see it back to FA soon, perhaps. Mafeu 13:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Support for removal of FA status as well. I think it still needs some work for it to be an FA. - Enzo Aquarius 13:46, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Archived --Alan del Beccio 06:30, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+