Memory Alpha
Memory Alpha

Citation[]

Should in this case the Encyclopedia considered be the most accurate production source? Then it would be "Category:Planets"....any thoughts? Tom (talk) 20:29, November 28, 2016 (UTC)

I see no strong reason to open that particular can of worms. The article works fine as it is, and it's hardly the first place of uncertain nature. That seems perfectly fine to me, it is what it is, and if the episode is unclear then so can we be, to best reflect canon. Cases like this tend to go in Category:Locations, unless we know they're in space (usually because they were spotted on a star chart), in which case they go in Category:Astronomical objects. -- Capricorn (talk) 14:56, December 1, 2016 (UTC)
Looks like 2:1 to me. --Alan (talk) 13:53, April 19, 2018 (UTC)
What do you mean by that? -- Capricorn (talk) 15:42, April 19, 2018 (UTC)

Planet or not?[]

We had this same problem with Hodos. --LauraCC (talk) 15:33, April 19, 2018 (UTC)

Also Sybaron, Tarpahk, Ubaya... basically half of Category:Locations. -- Capricorn (talk) 15:42, April 19, 2018 (UTC)

Unlike those, however, whether it's a location, family, person, race, culture, etc is unknown. We almost need a thing category. LOL --LauraCC (talk) 16:43, April 19, 2018 (UTC)