Perhaps a split[]
Move these creatures to Unnamed non-humanoids (23rd century) and include a link to that page on this page - the zoo still is a facility, but its non-humanoids belong on that page. --LauraCC (talk) 17:43, October 27, 2016 (UTC)
- Having pages for thematically linked groups of unnamed species is just something we do (see also Lactra VII zoo and Nibiru creatures. Personally, I am 100% for changing that and having all unnamed nonhumanoids conveniently collected on one page without ad hoc exceptions - but be aware that that pretty much would be a change in practice. -- Capricorn (talk) 21:37, October 27, 2016 (UTC)
All right. :) --LauraCC (talk) 14:00, October 29, 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not against said split, just to be clear. -- Capricorn (talk) 23:28, October 29, 2016 (UTC)
- While I agree that they are creatures of their own nature, but having them grouped in this fashion is truly preferred in terms of usefulness, on account of making articles useful for readers, because quite frankly, nothing on Star Trek has ever been described as an "unnamed non-humanoid", so who would ever think to look for this, which clearly defines and describes its content, verses some obscure-o diarrhea title like the alternative offers. --Alan del Beccio (talk) 19:32, June 28, 2017 (UTC)