Split suggestions Edit

In the first draft script of ENT: "The Andorian Incident", the Vulcan "Elder" (as he is called on this page) has the name "T'Kosh" and the "Initiate" (as he is known here) is named "Sulok". As a result, I'd like to suggest we move those entries to pages called "T'Kosh" and "Sulok". --Defiant (talk) 19:12, January 27, 2017 (UTC)

Wouldn't that be a split, then, as there's more than those two on this page?
Also, lately MA has been re-considering naming people based on script names... --LauraCC (talk) 19:13, January 27, 2017 (UTC)
This doesn't apply the the discussion on "completing" names for people, as these people have no names. Do we have anything after the first draft? It's not uncommon for things like names to change between drafts. - Archduk3 19:21, January 27, 2017 (UTC)
Ah. Well, then. Thrusters on full... :) --LauraCC (talk) 19:22, January 27, 2017 (UTC)

In the final draft script, they're called "Elder" and "Initiate". So, really, the only "names" we have for them are "T'Kosh" and "Sulok". --Defiant (talk) 19:25, January 27, 2017 (UTC)

If the names were deliberately removed from the final script, and that trumps the first draft per policy, then we don't have any names for these characters. - Archduk3 19:47, January 27, 2017 (UTC)

I'm absolutely fine with that, but the policy page doesn't seem to mention earlier drafts being preferred to later ones for naming articles. So, maybe that's something that we could add, for clarification(?) --Defiant (talk) 22:11, January 27, 2017 (UTC)
Actually, I've just spotted where it does say that, as it says, "Script versions take precedence in order of date." Sorry for not noticing that immediately, and I'm totally fine (now) with these entries remaining here. --Defiant (talk) 22:16, January 27, 2017 (UTC)

And a name-titled redirect that would send people to these individuals would be useless as they'd likely not search up those names to begin with. --LauraCC (talk) 19:13, January 30, 2017 (UTC)

P'Jem personnel Edit

Suggesting a further split of the same Vulcans to "P'Jem personnel". --LauraCC (talk) 19:16, January 30, 2017 (UTC)

Oppose. Why do people keep wanting to create more Unnamed pages? There are too many of them already and it makes specific characters hard to find. --NetSpiker (talk) 00:13, January 31, 2017 (UTC)

They could either be mentioned on the P'Jem page as a list, or they could remain here and be linked to on a personnel page. --LauraCC (talk) 16:07, January 31, 2017 (UTC)

That's fine. Sorry about lashing out at you. --NetSpiker (talk) 01:36, February 1, 2017 (UTC)

No sweat. --LauraCC (talk) 16:25, February 1, 2017 (UTC)

Support. They have a definite posting and can linked from P'Jem. --| TrekFan Open a channel 02:42, February 3, 2018 (UTC)
Support too, once some bonehead issues complicating what P'Jem is are resolved, as P'Jem inhabitants would really be the preferred namespace. --Alan (talk) 18:15, May 8, 2018 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.