FA status Edit

Nomination (21 June - 02 July 2008, Success) Edit

Like I said on the "peer review" page I want to nominate this article for a featured article. I've worked on it and changed it from a stub like article to one which covers Pat Tallman and her Star Trek connections completely. The peer review was left without comments so here is the nomination. – Tom 08:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Support, with minor concerns - Well-written and constructed (I contributed some minor details to the article). My only concern is that her actual work on Star Trek is only a single paragraph in the prose. This perhaps could be expanded, but is not an obstacle for my support - the article is strong as-is. -- Michael Warren | Talk 10:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Support - I would agree with Michael, although this would not stop me from supporting its application for FA. TrekFan 15:17, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Support, also with minor concerns - Michael, I know exactly where you're coming from. Her career in other roles other than Trek take up a lot of space, and IMHO it's not all too necessary - although every other actor/stunt on MA has a background career on their pages as well. But for checking all the connections would definitely have taken a while, I know what it's like sifting through hundreds of pages looking for the right information. Dave 02:02, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment - Come on, guys! We only need two more votes to secure an FA! TrekFan 00:13, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Support - This is another one that I would not have known that she played so many characters. Great job! ---- Willie LLAP 00:27, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Support Not very often you see such an informative and well written article for an actress who has played many non-primary characters. Definitely worthy of FA status. Melak talk 18:20, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Archived.– Cleanse 10:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Reconfirmation (11 Apr - 01 May 2012, Success) Edit

A FA from 2005. It still seems well written and comprehensive to me, and I think its status should continue. 31dot 10:24, April 11, 2012 (UTC)

  • Support. - Archduk3 17:25, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support. As a main contributor to this article I would be delighted about a reconfirmation as featured article. I am updating the article frequently. Tom 19:16, April 11, 2012 (UTC)

Review (29 Mar - 19 April 2014, Upheld) Edit

Another article I work constantly on and I would consider this one also a featured article status deserving one. Tom (talk) 14:30, March 29, 2014 (UTC)

  • Support. - Archduk3 15:32, March 29, 2014 (UTC)
  • Support, Ditto, knew her from Babylon 5, didn't realize what presence she had in Star Trek, so nice example of what MA is for. A minor cosmetic issue of personal taste: the section "Personal life and interests" is presented in a "bullet point" style which IMHO constitutes something of a visual style break with the rest of the article. Personally I think slightly more beefed out prose is aesthetically more pleasing in this case - Sennim (talk) 11:06, March 30, 2014 (UTC)
    • Thank you for your vote and comment, Sennim. I will work on the personal section of the article and add a few more information within the next days. Tom (talk) 11:09, March 30, 2014 (UTC)
  • Support --| TrekFan Open a channel 09:21, March 31, 2014 (UTC)
Ok, Sennim. You got me. I've expanded the article with information from her biography, added images, brought the "visually breaking" personal section into the article text and added more info with a bit of research. I would really appreciate more votes on this article. Tom (talk) 03:19, April 13, 2014 (UTC)
Ha, ha. impressive, as usual. If it were allowed, I'd given you a double vote--Sennim (talk) 12:27, April 14, 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much. :) Tom (talk) 20:04, April 14, 2014 (UTC)

Peer review Edit

I want to include this article in the featured articles list. I expanded this article from an article with a few pictures, three stub sentences and I think two external links and I think it deserves a featured status. Useful comments and contrubutions are really appreciated. – Tom 14:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.