Talk: Section 31 drone ship

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Section 31 drone ship article. For general discussion, go to Memory Alpha's Discussions or Discord. Click here to start a new discussion on this talk page. Consider enabling EasyTalk to improve the usability of talk pages.

Merge[]

Stupid me didn't see we had this page already, sorry. I do disagree that this is a Section 31 design, though -- Georgious's reaction to their appearance indicates that Control built them for its own purposes. - Mitchz95 (talk) 17:08, April 25, 2019 (UTC)

If that's true, then the other page might be better off sent here. Is "fighter" a valid term for this type of vehicle, or speculative?

Of course, if there really is any reason to doubt the design/ownership, drone ship is an open placement option. --Alan (talk) 17:27, April 25, 2019 (UTC)

There doesn't seem to be a reason to disambiguate this drone fighter. - Archduk 3 (on an unsecure connection) 22:00, April 25, 2019 (UTC)

It's not drone fighter, it's "drone ship" as seen on Po's display. And the idea that Control built them is speculation. -- UncertainError (talk) 22:16, April 25, 2019 (UTC)

That first sentence information would be useful on the article page, wouldn't you think? They are only called "drones" on screen. --Alan (talk) 11:50, April 26, 2019 (UTC)

SNW app[]

It would probably be best to include the new "Starbase 1 drones" used at Starbase 1 with this and move this page to that name or Starfleet drone ship, as Section 31 is a Federation/Starfleet entity anyway. –Gvsualan (talk) 11:33, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

I agree if they are of the same design. ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 15:44, 16 June 2023 (UTC)