For general discussion, please visit Memory Alpha's Discussions feature, or join the chat on Discord.
Featured article nomination[]
I find it to be a precise, well-written and thought-out, clear informational article about the character. I therefore hereby submit it for Featured Article status. – Crimsondawn hears you... 21:55, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- SUPPORT!!! Not to toot my own horn, but I've gone over it and cleaned up some glaring (and not so glaring) grammatical and syntax errors so I am seconding this article for nomination (can I do that?) -Italianajt 19:43, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed you can. In fact, this needs 5 supports in the minimum time in order to pass. --OuroborosCobra talk 20:39, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Oppose: The "clothing" list in the background information section is incomplete! This should either be removed or completed, preferably before featured article status is granted. --Defiant 21:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC)- Well, looks like there are half the episodes from season 1 and 3 of season 3 missing (including naked T'Pol in Harbinger!). I can certainly work on those these next few days. But if everyone wants to remove the list (I vote keep it actually) I won't bother lol DhaliaUnsung 03:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- The clothing list is all finished! -- DhaliaUnsung 14:51, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - both myself and DhaliaUnsung have agreed that the "clothing" list could be improved if it listed how often T'Pol wore each outfit. As it is, the point of this section is completely lost on me, although it has (currently unrealized) potential. --Defiant 17:45, 14 June 2009 (UTC)- I support this nomination. The T'Pol article has been very helpful to me in the past, when researching the character for various endeavors. I find it organized, and very informative. -- Remember The Girl 22:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Comment - other than my clothing nitpick (see above), I find this article to have a repetitive sentence structure! Even though others might disagree with me and it is largely a very informative article, I feel this repeated structure draws me out of the article's meaning as the repetition is so prevalent. Although I've tried to introduce more variety of the sentence structures in this article, I still feel it could use a lot of work and would be willing to support the page if it didn't have so much of this repetition, as my clothing nitpick is just that - a trivial nitpick. I'm not sure what you call the type of sentence structure that this article uses time and again but this particular sentence (yes, the one you're reading right now!) is not an example of it whereas each of the previous sentences, in this comment of mine, are and it relates to how the sentence begins. --Defiant 11:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)- Support - Having personally made numerous changes to this article lately, I'm a lot happier with the majority of its content. The "clothing" section could still, IMO, be improved but that should not be a reason for preventing the article from achieving FA status as perfection is not required and the vast majority of this article is very informative and was so, even before the changes I made to it. --Defiant 02:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- What would you suggest needs improvement on the clothing section. I admit that I feel a bit responsible for it! What can I do to help? -- DhaliaUnsung 16:42, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Thought it was an informative article, though I must admit a lack of knowledge of Star Trek: Enterprise in general. Made me want to watch more of the show though. - Archduk3 22:32, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- Featured in July 2009. --Alan (talk) 11:49, June 6, 2020 (UTC)