Timeline[]
Are we sure that the Enterprise-J is from an alternate timeline? The language used when Archer is aboard Enterprise-J is ambiguous, as it's referred to as "400 years in the future" and that the Sphere-Builders "[had] seen this future and they want to change the outcome." 99.6.9.145 01:41, August 14, 2016 (UTC)
- "This future" doesn't mean that it isn't an alternate time line, simply that it was the possible future they saw. 31dot (talk) 10:05, August 14, 2016 (UTC)
Ok, but we're not adding speculation to the page when we say Enterprise-J is in an alternate timeline. We're not just assuming that it's in alternate future right? (99.6.9.145 17:24, August 14, 2016 (UTC))
Armament[]
Doesn't Enterprise-J have phasers or are the weapons it fires in the episode not phasers? 99.6.9.145 01:41, August 14, 2016 (UTC)
- The Enterprise-J never fired any weapons in the Star Trek: Enterprise episode it was in, it was the other Federation ships that fired their weapons. -- Typhuss999 (talk) 01:47, August 14, 2016 (UTC)
No, remember, it's very early in the episode where a red phaser-like beam is emitted by Enterprise-J and hits a passing ship. It comes from Enterprise-J. What is it? 99.6.9.145 06:05, August 14, 2016 (UTC) It destroys a sphere-builder vessel, type 1 to be exact. 99.6.9.145 07:31, August 14, 2016 (UTC)
Ok, they just looked like phasers, or rather the NX-type's phase cannons since they were red, but made the sound of phasers, rather than the phase cannons. 99.6.9.145 15:41, August 14, 2016 (UTC)
- That's when you call it a particle weapon.--Alan del Beccio (talk) 16:44, December 2, 2016 (UTC)
View from the inside[]
Don't we see what looks like the underside of the ship's saucer section from the window in the episode? (99.6.9.145 17:39, August 14, 2016 (UTC))