Talk: Unnamed Federation starships (23rd century)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Unnamed Federation starships (23rd century) article. It is not for general discussion; for that, go to Memory Alpha's Discussions or Discord. Click here to start a new discussion on this talk page.

Garth's starship[]

I suggest merging this article with Garth of Izar. Aside from the fact that we don't know that "Garth's starship" was a single ship(even this article suggests it could be more than one ship), we know nothing about it that is different from the events of Garth's life, which are covered in his article.--31dot 22:02, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

I suggest this be merged with Unnamed Federation starships, which is what this is anyway. - Archduk 3 22:20, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Kirk's first command[]

This ship was James T. Kirk's first command. Upon assuming command, Kirk requested Gary Mitchell be assigned to the ship as well. In 2265, Mitchell told Elizabeth Dehner this, and she later mentioned it to Kirk when struggling to understand how he and Spock could speak so callously about a man they had worked with for several years. (TOS: "Where No Man Has Gone Before")

Dehner's referring to it as Kirk's first command, rather than "this ship" or "the Enterprise, suggests that it was a different ship.

Have removed this per this discussion. --LauraCC (talk) 16:35, August 15, 2017 (UTC)

NCC-1276 type ship[]

Is 1276 really a thing? When flipped upside down, and c\leaned up, I still see "1279" - [1] Appalachia Actual (talk) 17:51, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

I tend to agree. This should be merged with the other as a background note and be caulked up as a production error. --Gvsualan (talk) 18:13, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

I think that we should change the class name back to NCC-1279-type and recognize it as a unique class in Starfleet. We have two examples of the type. Memphis77 (talk) 19:19, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

I am going to defer this, By that picture it would be closer to NCC-127S but it also looks like it could be an 8 or 9. Maybe leave it as unidentified ship like the other 2 originally were. And maybe later in the season we see it better. I sure can not make out the Farragut or Archer from what we seen on screen. Also both now have markings unlike the prior known appearances. ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 20:00, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

In Jörg's screenshot it looks like it's definitely a 9. JagoAndLitefoot (talk) 20:41, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Could we perhaps reconcile the two appearances by saying that the Broken Circle's 1279 is a replica of the real 1279? M'Benga did say that they built it in the cave. -- UncertainError (talk) 22:00, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

He was speculating as to how the ship got there.Memphis77 (talk) 22:34, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Maybe change to NCC-1275 as that might be more represented of what we can see and might be the best we ever see. I assume they are using Microgramma font and 5 in that font is sorta close. ‐ Yaroze86 (talk) 23:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

I was a production error. Let's stop inventing theories. –Gvsualan (talk) 00:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

I am going to mark this for deletion. I think this ship can be added to the Unnamed Federation starships (23rd century) page. Appalachia Actual (talk) 13:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Scott's ships[]

"Over the course of his fifty-one year career, Captain Montgomery Scott had served aboard the USS St*****er, both USS Enterprise and USS Enterprise-A, in addition to eight other freighters, cruisers, and starships. (TNG: "Relics")."

Should this be changed to 7 as we now have a name of possible one of the 8? ‐Yaroze86 (talk) 17:33, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

I'm ahead of you. I already changed it from 9. --LauraCC (talk) 17:34, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

I did not see that change. Awesome work! ‐Yaroze86 (talk) 17:35, 10 August 2023 (UTC)