Station from database

Unnamed space station, lcars

Station from database?

Can someone post a pix of this schematic so we have some idea what your talking about? Federation 22:58, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

As would I. Especially if it is a specific station...and not just an image of Regula I, as the actual Spacedock model wasn't introduced in STII. --Alan del Beccio 23:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
another schematic available at the time would be Franz Joseph's HQ spacedock seen in the SF Tech Manual. perhaps this is the one described? -- Captain M.K.B. 19:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
I would assume it is the image I posted at the top of this subsection. --Alan del Beccio 05:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

WHAT IS THAT? Doesn't even look like a spacestation. Please tell me there is a better shot than this? Didn't someone say this diagram appeared in ST:II as well? If so, someone might be able to get a cleaner capture since it was probably shot on higher film grade or a generally better DVD transfer. Federation 02:28, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


Merge with Unnamed Federation space stations. A perfect "catch-all" for all unnamed Federation stations whose name or specifics are not completely known. --Alan del Beccio 23:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Support. --OuroborosCobra talk 00:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
SupportFederation 03:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Whoa! What happened? Was this page merged or overwritten? Federation 03:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

It was merged just like you supported to have done. --Alan del Beccio 03:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, but at the time I posted that it wasn't. Maybe just a digital fart. Federation 04:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Or perhaps I wasn't done merging it yet. It's not instantaneous, you know. --Alan del Beccio 04:47, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


...this to expand the scope to all unnamed stations and spacedocks, be they in space or on a planet, or even inside an astroid. The few other pages covering similar topics, like Earth spacedocks, could then be linked to from here. - Archduk3 23:12, November 23, 2016 (UTC)

Sounds like a good enough idea. So the main reason is to be inclusive enough to offer a logical place to oddball installations like asteroid bases, or are there other advantages? -- Capricorn (talk) 05:45, November 26, 2016 (UTC)

The general idea is that we don't have a "top" unnamed stations page, and little reason to keep this page separate from one if we create it. - Archduk3 20:59, November 26, 2016 (UTC)

Ok, that does indeed sound like it would improve things. -- Capricorn (talk) 02:43, November 27, 2016 (UTC)
Scope question: do unnamed satellites go here? And if not, why? -- Capricorn (talk) 06:59, December 10, 2016 (UTC)

They should be connected to this and the fixed installations list in some manner, but a seperate page at artificial satellites, so as to cover the few named ones as well, might be best. "Unnamed satellites" is unnamed moons based on our usage of the term satellite. - Archduk3 09:37, December 10, 2016 (UTC)

You can separate it using the section headers "Ground-based", "Orbital" (satellites), and "Freestanding" (stations in the middle of nowhere). --LauraCC (talk) 18:39, December 11, 2016 (UTC)

Starbase (2256)

On my netflix, the subtitles name this starbase as starbase 28. Shouldn't we create its own page? SimFã B. (talk) 19:21, October 16, 2017 (UTC)

Fascinating. Here in the states, the starbase was not identified.--Memphis77 (talk) 19:35, October 16, 2017 (UTC)
Subtitles are a poor source of information as they are usually written by someone not involved with the production. That said, I would think that wasn't just made up and that they got the number from somewhere official. I don't know if I would give it its own page yet, but it might be worth a background note. If the script is released later, that might shed some light on this. 31dot (talk) 19:38, October 16, 2017 (UTC)

Subtitles normally would be a poor source of information, however this is discovery. The subtitles of the Russian Netflix ended up being correct about the vice admiral's name. SimFã B. (talk) 19:44, October 16, 2017 (UTC)

This being Discovery doesn't change anything. 31dot (talk) 20:42, October 16, 2017 (UTC)

It should at least have a note on the main page. SimFã B. (talk) 16:45, October 17, 2017 (UTC)

Corinth IV starship base: Merge

The episode only referred to as [the] Starship base on Corinth IV. Pretty obvious case of something that belongs in Unnamed fixed installations. -- Capricorn (talk) 18:05, September 13, 2018 (UTC)

Not obvious, but certainly apparent. Merged. --Alan (talk) 11:51, October 3, 2018 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+